Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32775380›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2020

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients: Difficult cannulation and adverse events.

Fatema Tabak, Hui-Shan Wang, Quan-Peng Li, Xian-Xiu Ge, Fei Wang, Guo-Zhong Ji, Lin Miao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fatema TabakInstitute of Digestive Endoscopy and Medical Centre for Digestive Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China.
Hui-Shan WangInstitute of Digestive Endoscopy and Medical Centre for Digestive Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China.
Quan-Peng LiInstitute of Digestive Endoscopy and Medical Centre for Digestive Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xian-Xiu GeInstitute of Digestive Endoscopy and Medical Centre for Digestive Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China.
Fei WangInstitute of Digestive Endoscopy and Medical Centre for Digestive Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China.
Guo-Zhong JiInstitute of Digestive Endoscopy and Medical Centre for Digestive Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China.
Lin MiaoInstitute of Digestive Endoscopy and Medical Centre for Digestive Disease, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu Province, China. linmiao@njmu.edu.cn.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a valuable therapeutic technique for pancreatobiliary diseases, and its application in the elderly is no longer limited. However, a higher incidence of procedure difficulty and periprocedural adverse events might be expected in elderly patients due to the presence of other medical disorders and the poor general condition of this population.

aimTo evaluate the incidence, causes, and management of difficult biliary cannulation during ERCP in elderly patients and the role of difficult cannulation as a risk factor for adverse events.

methodsA total of 614 patients who underwent ERCP during the study period were prospectively studied and divided into two groups based on their age. One hundred and forty-six patients were aged 80 years or older and 468 patients were aged less than 80 years. The primary outcome measurements were cannulation difficulty, cannulation success rate, ERCP procedure time, and related adverse events.

resultsThere was no difference in the incidence of difficult cannulation among the two groups (32.9%

conclusionAdvanced age has not been proved to be a risk factor for difficult cannulation, and secondary cannulation techniques can be safely and efficaciously utilized in this group. Patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 and difficult cannulation are associated with an increased overall adverse events rate, while age ≥ 80 years is not.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsCannulation techniquesDifficult cannulationElderlyEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyPost- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID32775380
PMCPMC7385608
OpenAlexW3044352913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.