Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32775177›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

Evaluating the impact of the California 1995 smoke-free workplace law on population smoking prevalence using a synthetic control method.

Paige Sheridan, Dennis Trinidad, Sara McMenamin, John P Pierce, Tarik Benmarhnia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paige SheridanDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
Dennis TrinidadDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
Sara McMenaminDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
John P PierceDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
Tarik BenmarhniaDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.

Funding

Improving the Health of Aging Women and Men.T32AG058529 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
The role of ENDS use in changing rates of escalation and quitting of cigarette smoking in those under age 35 years in US populationR01CA234539 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BENMARHNIA, TARIK, PIERCE, JOHN P · 2018 to 2020
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA234539NIA NIH HHS T32 AG058529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the impact of the California 1995 Smoke-Free Workplace Act (SFWA) on cigarette smoking prevalence in the population. We used survey responses related to cigarette smoking from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 1990 to 2000. We utilize a synthetic control method which creates a weighted combination of control states to produce a single 'synthetic' control group to best approximate the counterfactual trend in California in the absence of the SFWA. Variables known to be associated with smoking were included to weight each state in the pre-intervention period as medians by state and included: distribution of race/ethnicity (White, Black, Asian, Hispanic), sex (Male/Female), marital status (married/unmarried), high school education (yes/no) and employment status (yes/no). We find evidence that there was a small decrease in population smoking prevalence in California in the year immediately following the SFWA, but this effect was not sustained beyond 1995. We hypothesize that one potential explanation for the lack of prolonged impact on population smoking prevalence is that there are sustained effects from the passage of 1989 California Proposition 99, which enacted an excise tax on tobacco products. Understanding how workplace smoking ban legislation affects population smoking behaviors is necessary to better inform policy development in other states and counties and to improve existing policies. Future work should consider the impact of smoking legislation impacts subgroups of the population by socioeconomic status, occupation or race/ethnicity.

Indexed as

Population smoking prevalenceSFWA, Smoke-Free Workplace ActSmoke-free legislationTobacco control

Identifiers

PMID32775177
PMCPMC7394745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.