ArticlePeerJ2020
The effects of humic substances on DNA isolation from soils.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic analyses of Purpureocillium lilacinum reveal unique DNA regions for developing isolate-specific molecular markers.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Refining Biodegradability Assessments of Polymers Through Microbial Biomolecule Quantification.Polymers · 2025Article
- Molecular Detection and Genotyping ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Optimising RNA extraction for paddy bulk soil samples for metatranscriptome sequencing.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Current Approaches for Genetic Manipulation ofBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Review
- Nucleic Acid Based Testing (NABing): A Game Changer Technology for Public Health.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Evaluation of commercial RNA extraction kits for long-read metatranscriptomics in soil.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- Assessing benthic macroinvertebrate communities' spatial heterogeneity in Mediterranean transitional waters through eDNA metabarcoding.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of DNA extraction methods on different sample matrices within the same terrestrial ecosystem.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of molecular inhibitors of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- A New Method for Discovering Plant Biostimulants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Risk Assessment of Industrial Microbes Using a Terrestrial Mesocosm Platform.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Physical Pretreatments Applied in Three Commercial Kits for the Extraction of High-Quality DNA from Activated Sewage Sludge.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Sequencing Depth Has a Stronger Effect than DNA Extraction on Soil Bacterial Richness Discovery.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Improved method for the extraction of high-quality DNA from lignocellulosic compost samples for metagenomic studies.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Identifying Hidden Viable Bacterial Taxa in Tropical Forest Soils Using Amplicon Sequencing of Enrichment Cultures.Biology · 2021Article
- CRISPR loci-PCR as Tool for TrackingMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Pond chironomid communities revealed by molecular species delimitation reflect eutrophication.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHumic substances (HS) are compounds with a complicated structure, present in the humus soil layer, water, lake sediments, peat, brown coal and shales. Due to their similar physicochemical properties to DNA, they may have an adverse effect on the subsequent use of the isolated material. The main aim of this research was to examine the effect of HS on DNA isolation depending on the soil type and land use, taking into account the spectroscopic full characteristics of HS fractions.
methodsThe research was conducted on eight types of soil sample. Soils represented the most important Soil Reference Groups for temperate climates: Fluvisols, Regosols, Cambisols, Arenosols, Histosols and Luvisols. Soil samples were also collected from areas diversified in terms of use: arable land, grassland and forest. The extraction of HS fractions was performed using the procedure recommended by the International HS Society. The fractional composition of HS was characterized by UV-Vis and fluorescence methods. Soil DNA is extracted by direct cell lysis in the using a CTAB-based method with a commonly-used commercial soil DNA isolation kit. The basis for assessing the quantity and quality of extracted DNA was the Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction since the analysis of soil DNA often relies on the use of PCR to study soil microorganisms.
resultsBased on the results, it can be concluded that in the presence of a high concentration of HS, the isolated DNA was low quality and the additional purification procedure was necessary. Despite the differentiation of the internal structure of HS fractions, the decisive factor in the efficiency of DNA isolation from soil samples was the total carbon content in HS. Reduced DNA yields can significantly constrain PCR detection limits to levels inadequate for metagenomic analysis, especially from humus-rich soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.