Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32775047›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

The effects of humic substances on DNA isolation from soils.

Ewa Wnuk, Adam Waśko, Anna Walkiewicz, Piotr Bartmiński, Romualda Bejger, Lilla Mielnik, Andrzej Bieganowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Detection and Genotyping ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Current Approaches for Genetic Manipulation ofBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A New Method for Discovering Plant Biostimulants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa WnukInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Adam WaśkoFaculty of Food Science and Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Microbiology and Human Nutrition, University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Anna WalkiewiczInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Piotr BartmińskiDepartment of Geology, Soil Science and Geoinformation, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.
Romualda BejgerDepartment of Bioengineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland.
Lilla MielnikDepartment of Bioengineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland.
Andrzej BieganowskiInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLWest Pomeranian University of Technology · PLMaria Curie-Skłodowska University · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHumic substances (HS) are compounds with a complicated structure, present in the humus soil layer, water, lake sediments, peat, brown coal and shales. Due to their similar physicochemical properties to DNA, they may have an adverse effect on the subsequent use of the isolated material. The main aim of this research was to examine the effect of HS on DNA isolation depending on the soil type and land use, taking into account the spectroscopic full characteristics of HS fractions.

methodsThe research was conducted on eight types of soil sample. Soils represented the most important Soil Reference Groups for temperate climates: Fluvisols, Regosols, Cambisols, Arenosols, Histosols and Luvisols. Soil samples were also collected from areas diversified in terms of use: arable land, grassland and forest. The extraction of HS fractions was performed using the procedure recommended by the International HS Society. The fractional composition of HS was characterized by UV-Vis and fluorescence methods. Soil DNA is extracted by direct cell lysis in the using a CTAB-based method with a commonly-used commercial soil DNA isolation kit. The basis for assessing the quantity and quality of extracted DNA was the Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction since the analysis of soil DNA often relies on the use of PCR to study soil microorganisms.

resultsBased on the results, it can be concluded that in the presence of a high concentration of HS, the isolated DNA was low quality and the additional purification procedure was necessary. Despite the differentiation of the internal structure of HS fractions, the decisive factor in the efficiency of DNA isolation from soil samples was the total carbon content in HS. Reduced DNA yields can significantly constrain PCR detection limits to levels inadequate for metagenomic analysis, especially from humus-rich soils.

Indexed as

DNA extractionFulvic acidsHumic acidsSoil use

Identifiers

PMID32775047
PMCPMC7384437
OpenAlexW3044332703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.