Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32775009›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020

Intra-procedural real-time ultrasound fusion imaging improves the therapeutic effect and safety of liver tumor ablation in difficult cases.

Yinglin Long, Erjiao Xu, Qingjing Zeng, Jinxiu Ju, Qiannan Huang, Ping Liang, Rongqin Zheng, Kai Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of Fusion Imaging in Image-Guided Thermal Ablations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yinglin LongDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, China.
Erjiao XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, China.
Qingjing ZengDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, China.
Jinxiu JuDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, China.
Qiannan HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, China.
Ping LiangDepartment of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital Beijing, China.
Rongqin ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, China.
Kai LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In certain difficult cases involving tumors unclear in B-mode ultrasound or tumors in a high-risk location, image-guided liver tumor thermal ablation was previously contraindicated. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the value of intra-procedural ultrasound fusion imaging in improving the therapeutic effect and safety of liver tumor ablation in difficult cases. A total of 502 patients (441 males and 61 females, aged 52 ± 11 years) with 805 liver tumors (16 ± 6 mm; range, 4-29 mm) who underwent thermal ablation with intra-procedural fusion imaging from October 2010 to June 2018 in our hospital were enrolled. Fusion imaging was employed for targeting, puncture guidance and immediate evaluation of the therapeutic response. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed one month after ablation and every 3~6 months in the follow-up period. 511 and 294 liver tumors were in classified in the difficult case group and the non-difficult case group, respectively. The technical efficacy rate was 99.4% (800/805), and no difference was found between the two groups (P=0.658). No significant difference in the local tumor progression rate was found between the difficult case group (1 year: 3.2%; 3 years: 7.6%; 5 years: 7.6%) and non-difficult case group (1 year: 2.1%; 3 years: 5.5%; 5 years: 11.6%) (P=0.874). The major complication rate was 1.8% (11/608). Injury to adjacent organs occurred in only 1 patient who sustained a bile duct injury. We conclude that intra-procedural fusion imaging can improve the therapeutic efficacy and safety of thermal ablation in difficult cases and may expand the indications for thermal ablation.

Indexed as

difficult casesFusion imagingliver tumorthermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID32775009
PMCPMC7407341
OpenAlexW3049118177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.