ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020
Intra-procedural real-time ultrasound fusion imaging improves the therapeutic effect and safety of liver tumor ablation in difficult cases.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of fusion imaging for immediate post-ablation assessment of malignant liver neoplasms: A systematic review.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Fusion Imaging in Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Thermal Ablation: Current Applications and Future Directions in Microwave Technologies.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Real-Life Clinical Use and Outcomes of Fusion Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Experience from Two Italian Centers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Surgery or Percutaneous Ablation for Liver Tumors? The Key Points Are: When, Where, and How Large.Cancers · 2025Article
- Using multimodal ultrasound technology to improve the success rate of liver tumor puncture for lesions with poor visibility on conventional ultrasound imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases with ultrasound fusion imaging assistance: a stratified analysis study based on tumor size and location.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Shear-wave elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound algorithm for noninvasive characterization of focal liver lesions.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Prevention of major biliary complications by fusion imaging for thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors adjacent to the bile ducts: a preliminary comparative study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Role of Fusion Imaging in Image-Guided Thermal Ablations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In certain difficult cases involving tumors unclear in B-mode ultrasound or tumors in a high-risk location, image-guided liver tumor thermal ablation was previously contraindicated. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the value of intra-procedural ultrasound fusion imaging in improving the therapeutic effect and safety of liver tumor ablation in difficult cases. A total of 502 patients (441 males and 61 females, aged 52 ± 11 years) with 805 liver tumors (16 ± 6 mm; range, 4-29 mm) who underwent thermal ablation with intra-procedural fusion imaging from October 2010 to June 2018 in our hospital were enrolled. Fusion imaging was employed for targeting, puncture guidance and immediate evaluation of the therapeutic response. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed one month after ablation and every 3~6 months in the follow-up period. 511 and 294 liver tumors were in classified in the difficult case group and the non-difficult case group, respectively. The technical efficacy rate was 99.4% (800/805), and no difference was found between the two groups (P=0.658). No significant difference in the local tumor progression rate was found between the difficult case group (1 year: 3.2%; 3 years: 7.6%; 5 years: 7.6%) and non-difficult case group (1 year: 2.1%; 3 years: 5.5%; 5 years: 11.6%) (P=0.874). The major complication rate was 1.8% (11/608). Injury to adjacent organs occurred in only 1 patient who sustained a bile duct injury. We conclude that intra-procedural fusion imaging can improve the therapeutic efficacy and safety of thermal ablation in difficult cases and may expand the indications for thermal ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32775009PMC7407341W3049118177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.