ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2020
Objective Imaging Diagnostics for Dry Eye Disease.
Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing automated and manual assessments of tear break-up time using different non-invasive devices and a fluorescein procedure.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Bridging Therapeutics and Nanotechnology in Dry Eye Disease: A Review of Risk Factors, Drug Delivery Barriers, and Recent and Future Endeavors for Disease Management.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Dry Eye Disease: From Mechanisms to Management and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Management of Dry Eye Disease Pre- and Post-Cataract Surgery: A Personalized Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Dry Eye Disease And The Jenvis Dry Eye Report Diagnosis Tool: A Literature Review with Emphasis On African Populations.Clinical optometry · 2026Review
- Imaging Approaches for the Diagnosis of Dry Eye: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Application of Terahertz Technology in Corneas and Corneal Diseases: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A review of the application of in-vivo confocal microscopy on conjunctival diseases.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Review
- Applications of Imaging Technologies in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Narrative Literature Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Potential therapeutic effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors on corneal diseases.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Animal Models in Eye Research: Focus on Corneal Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- [IMPULSE Study: Impact of COVID-19 in the present of ophthalmology focusing on ocular surface and future trends].Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia · 2023Article
- Role ofIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Development and validation of a diagnostic model for the identification of chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD).Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence into the Approach for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Dry Eye Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Developing a diagnosis model for dry eye disease in dogs using object detection.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Commentary: Evaluating ocular surface disease in glaucoma.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Topographic tear film trend and new parameters for non-invasive break up time test.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Dry eye disease and tear film assessment through a novel non-invasive ocular surface analyzer: The OSA protocol.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Assessment and Management of Dry Eye Disease and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Providing a Singapore Framework.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional diagnostic tests for dry eye disease (DED), such as fluorescein tear film break-up time and the Schirmer test, are often associated with poor reproducibility and reliability, which make the diagnosis, follow-up, and management of the disease challenging. Advances in ocular imaging technology enables objective and reproducible measurement of changes in the ocular surface, tear film, and optical quality associated with DED. In this review, the authors will discuss the application of various imaging techniques, such as, noninvasive tear break-up time, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, in vivo confocal microscopy, meibography, interferometry, aberrometry, thermometry, and tear film imager in DED. Many studies have shown these devices to correlate with clinical symptoms and signs of DED, suggesting the potential of these imaging modalities as alternative tests for diagnosis and monitoring of the condition.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.