Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774884›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2020

Plasticity leaves a phenotypic signature during local adaptation.

Reinder Radersma, Daniel W A Noble, Tobias Uller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Variation in Response to Water Availability AcrossPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Founders predict trait evolution and population performance after evolutionary rescue in the red flour beetle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evolvability and trait function predict phenotypic divergence of plant populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Local adaptation: Causal agents of selection and adaptive trait divergence.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2022
    Article
  18. Relaxed risk of predation drives parallel evolution of stickleback behavior.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Reinder RadersmaDepartment of Biology Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-6348
Daniel W A NobleDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology The Australian National University Canberra ACT Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-8743
Tobias UllerDepartment of Biology Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1293-5842
Lund University · SEAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic responses to a novel or extreme environment are initially plastic, only later to be followed by genetic change. Whether or not environmentally induced phenotypes are sufficiently recurrent and fit to leave a signature in adaptive evolution is debated. Here, we analyze multivariate data from 34 plant reciprocal transplant studies to test: (1) if plasticity is an adaptive source of developmental bias that makes locally adapted populations resemble the environmentally induced phenotypes of ancestors; and (2) if plasticity, standing phenotypic variation and genetic divergence align during local adaptation. Phenotypic variation increased marginally in foreign environments but, as predicted, the direction of ancestral plasticity was generally well aligned with the phenotypic difference between locally adapted populations, making plasticity appear to "take the lead" in adaptive evolution. Plastic responses were sometimes more extreme than the phenotypes of locally adapted plants, which can give the impression that plasticity and evolutionary adaptation oppose each other; however, environmentally induced and locally adapted phenotypes were rarely misaligned. Adaptive fine-tuning of phenotypes-genetic accommodation-did not fall along the main axis of standing phenotypic variation or the direction of plasticity, and local adaptation did not consistently modify the direction or magnitude of plasticity. These results suggest that plasticity is a persistent source of developmental bias that shapes how plant populations adapt to environmental change, even when plasticity does not constrain how populations respond to selection.

Indexed as

adaptive plasticityevolvabilitygenetic accommodationphenotypic accommodationphenotypic plasticityplantsplasticity‐led evolutionP‐matrixreciprocal transplant

Identifiers

PMID32774884
PMCPMC7403707
OpenAlexW3034428310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.