Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774849›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Sultan Zaher Alshehri, Omar Safar Alshahrani, Nazal Ahmed Almsaoud, Muhammad Ahmad Al-Ghamdi, Abdulaziz Mohammed Alqahtani, Muath Mohammed Almurayyi, Ali Salem Autwdi, Saeed Ahmed Al-Ghamdi, Mohammed Mesadef Zogan, Abdulrahim Mohammed Alamri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sultan Zaher AlshehriDepartment of Urology, Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Omar Safar AlshahraniDepartment of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Nazal Ahmed AlmsaoudDepartment of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Ahmad Al-GhamdiDepartment of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Mohammed AlqahtaniDepartment of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Muath Mohammed AlmurayyiDepartment of Urology, Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Salem AutwdiDepartment of Urology, King Fahad Central Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Saeed Ahmed Al-GhamdiDepartment of Urology, King Fahad Hospital, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Mesadef ZoganDepartment of Urology, King Fahad Central Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahim Mohammed AlamriDepartment of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and subsequent biopsy in monitoring prostate cancer in men on active surveillance (AS) have not been defined clearly. In this systematic review, we aimed to review current literature about the usage of MRI examination in men with low-risk prostate cancer during active surveillance. For that, we searched seven databases to include all studies reporting magnetic resonance imaging in the AS of low-risk prostate cancer. We finally included 11 studies with 1237 patients included. Our results showed an adequate sensitivity and specificity of both modalities to detect disease progression; including disease upgrading and upstaging. However, the performance in the prediction of unfavorable disease was inferior to the detection of upgrading and upstaging. In terms of MRGB, the previous literature agreed on the superiority of using a combination of different biopsy schemes to get a better progression section. Noteworthy, mp-MRI and MRGB had a good predictive value limited to the first year, with TRUSGB showing a superior role in detecting patients with a GS ≥ 7, after that. In conclusion, both of mpMRI and MRGB have shown an adequate performance on assessing disease progression in the AS of low-risk prostate cancer patients. They can be used for disease staging and grading for successful treatment planning.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceMRGBMRIProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32774849
PMCPMC7398967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.