ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020
Gender discrimination against female surgeons: A cross-sectional study in a lower-middle-income country.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender Discrimination Against Women in Surgery Is Due to Implicit Bias Rather Than Quantifiable Differences in Clinical Performance.The Permanente journal · 2026Article
- Empowering Change: A Systematic Review of the Challenges Faced by Female Healthcare Workers in Pakistan.Cureus · 2026Review
- The 'leaky pipeline' in orthopaedic surgery: why female trainees drop out?Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Unveiling gender disparities among medical faculty in a developing country: A case study of a public sector teaching hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Editorial diversity correlates with journal impact factor and author diversity in cardiothoracic surgery.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical experiences of final-year undergraduates and the impact on their career aspiration stratified by sex/gender.GMS journal for medical education · 2024Article
- Sex-based Disparities Among Surgical Faculty Positions Across Medical Colleges in Pakistan.World journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Extent and types of gender-based discrimination against female medical students and physicians at five university hospitals in Germany - results of an online survey.GMS journal for medical education · 2023Article
- Female Surgeons for Obesity Treatment: a Snapshot Sampling in Academic Productivity : The Role of Women in Obesity Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2022Review
- Societal Preferences for Gender of Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study in the General Population of Pakistan.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Gender discrimination in surgical oncology: An in-house appraisal.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Impediment to Leadership Opportunities for Female Doctors - Gender Disparity in Pakistani Healthcare System -SHORT REPORT.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Factors Affecting Women Surgeons' Careers in Low-Middle-Income Countries: An International Survey.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Gender Inequity in Clinical Clerkships and its Influence on Career Selection: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Survival in general surgery: The female surgeons' perspective.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough gender discrimination and bias (GD/bias) experienced by female surgeons in the developed world has received much attention, GD/bias in lower-middle-income countries like Pakistan remains unexplored. Thus, our study explores how GD/bias is perceived and reported by surgeons in Pakistan.
methodA single-center cross-sectional anonymous online survey was sent to all surgeons practicing/training at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. The survey explored the frequency, source and impact of GD/bias among surgeons.
results98/194 surgeons (52.4%) responded to the survey, of which 68.4% were males and 66.3% were trainees. Only 19.4% of women surgeons reported 'significant' frequency of GD/bias during residency. A higher percentage of women reported 'insignificant' frequency of GD/bias during residency, as compared to males (61.3% vs. 32.8%; p = 0.004). However, more women surgeons reported facing GD/bias in various aspects of their career/training, including differences in mentorship (80.6% vs. 26.9%; p < 0.005) and differences in operating room opportunities (77.4% vs. 32.8%; p < 0.005). The source was most frequently reported to be co-residents of the opposite gender. Additionally, a high percentage of female surgeons reported that their experience of GD/bias had had a significant negative impact on their career/training progression, respect/value in the surgical team, job satisfaction and selection of specialty.
conclusionAlthough GD/bias has widespread impacts on the training/career of female surgeons in Pakistan, most females fail to recognize this GD/bias as "significant". Our results highlight a worrying lack of recognition of GD/bias by female surgeons, representing a major barrier to gender equity in surgery in Pakistan and emphasizing the need for future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.