Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774847›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Gender discrimination against female surgeons: A cross-sectional study in a lower-middle-income country.

Mahin B Janjua, Hina Inam, Russell S Martins, Nida Zahid, Abida K Sattar, Shaista M Khan, Sadaf Khan, Aneela Darbar, Nuzhat Faruqui, Sharmeen Akram and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The 'leaky pipeline' in orthopaedic surgery: why female trainees drop out?Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahin B JanjuaThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Hina InamThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Russell S MartinsThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Nida ZahidThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Abida K SattarThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Shaista M KhanThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Sadaf KhanThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Aneela DarbarThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Nuzhat FaruquiThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Sharmeen AkramThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Syed A EnamThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Adil H HaiderThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Mahim A MalikThe Aga Khan University, Pakistan.
Aga Khan University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough gender discrimination and bias (GD/bias) experienced by female surgeons in the developed world has received much attention, GD/bias in lower-middle-income countries like Pakistan remains unexplored. Thus, our study explores how GD/bias is perceived and reported by surgeons in Pakistan.

methodA single-center cross-sectional anonymous online survey was sent to all surgeons practicing/training at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. The survey explored the frequency, source and impact of GD/bias among surgeons.

results98/194 surgeons (52.4%) responded to the survey, of which 68.4% were males and 66.3% were trainees. Only 19.4% of women surgeons reported 'significant' frequency of GD/bias during residency. A higher percentage of women reported 'insignificant' frequency of GD/bias during residency, as compared to males (61.3% vs. 32.8%; p = 0.004). However, more women surgeons reported facing GD/bias in various aspects of their career/training, including differences in mentorship (80.6% vs. 26.9%; p < 0.005) and differences in operating room opportunities (77.4% vs. 32.8%; p < 0.005). The source was most frequently reported to be co-residents of the opposite gender. Additionally, a high percentage of female surgeons reported that their experience of GD/bias had had a significant negative impact on their career/training progression, respect/value in the surgical team, job satisfaction and selection of specialty.

conclusionAlthough GD/bias has widespread impacts on the training/career of female surgeons in Pakistan, most females fail to recognize this GD/bias as "significant". Our results highlight a worrying lack of recognition of GD/bias by female surgeons, representing a major barrier to gender equity in surgery in Pakistan and emphasizing the need for future research.

Identifiers

PMID32774847
PMCPMC7394833
OpenAlexW3045243135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.