Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774809›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of basic medical sciences2020

Comparison of the effects of intramyocardial and intravenous injections of human mesenchymal stem cells on cardiac regeneration after heart failure.

Behnaz Mokhtari, Nahid Aboutaleb, Donya Nazarinia, Mahin Nikougoftar, Seyed Mohammad Taghi Razavi Tousi, Mohammad Molazem, Mohammad-Reza Azadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Modified mRNA as a Treatment for Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Behnaz MokhtariPhysiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nahid AboutalebPhysiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Donya NazariniaPhysiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahin NikougoftarMedical Biotechnology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad Taghi Razavi TousiMedical Biotechnology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mohammad MolazemDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad-Reza AzadiPhysiology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExisting studies have demonstrated that intravenous and intramyocardial-administrated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) lead to tissue repair after cardiac disorders. We compared the efficiency of both administration methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsA rat model of isoproterenol-induced heart failure (ISO-HF) was established to compare the effects of intravenous and intramyocardial-administrated MSCs on cardiac fibrosis and function. The animals were randomly assigned into six groups: i) control or normal, ii) ISO-HF (HF) iii) ISO-HF rats treated with intramyocardial administration of culture medium (HF+IM/CM), iv) ISO-HF rats treated with intravenous administration of culture medium ( HF+IV/CM), v) ISO-HF rats treated with intravenous administration of MSCs (HF+IV/MSCs), vi) ISO-HF rats treated with intramyocardial administration of MSCs ( HF+IM/MSCs). Cultured MSCs and culture medium were administrated at 4 weeks after final injection of ISO. Heart function, identification of MSCs, osteogenic differentiation, adipogenic differentiation, cardiac fibrosis and tissue damage were evaluated by echocardiography, flow-cytometery, von Kossa, oil red O, Masson's trichrome and H & E staining, respectively.

resultsBoth intravenous and intramyocardial MSCs therapy significantly improved heart function and reduced cardiac fibrosis and tissue damage (

conclusionIn sum, our results confirm the validity of both administration methods in recovery of HF, but more future research is required.

Indexed as

failureHeart functionIntramyocardial injectionIntravenous injectionIsoproterenol-induced heartMesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID32774809
PMCPMC7395194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.