ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
Finding new cancer epigenetic and genetic biomarkers from cell-free DNA by combining SALP-seq and machine learning.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain tumor detection based on transcription regulation features identified from public cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA sequencing data.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review of publicly accessible databases for gastrointestinal cancer and future challenges in database construction.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Advancing precision medicine in hepatocellular carcinoma: current challenges and future directions in liquid biopsy, immune microenvironment, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and conversion therapy.Hepatic oncology · 2025Review
- BRPF1 in cancer epigenetics: a key regulator of histone acetylation and a promising therapeutic target.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
- Benchmarking UMI-aware and standard variant callers for low frequency ctDNA variant detection.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in liquid biopsy: Current diagnostic limitation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Liquid biopsy for gastric cancer: Techniques, applications, and future directions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Current and Future Perspectives of Cell-Free DNA in Liquid Biopsy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
- A computational method for large-scale identification of esophageal cancer-related genes.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- SEPTIN9-SDC2-VIM methylation signature as a biomarker for the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- Computational challenges in detection of cancer using cell-free DNA methylation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Machine Learning for Future Subtyping of the Tumor Microenvironment of Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinomas.Cancers · 2021Review
- Machine Learning Protocols in Early Cancer Detection Based on Liquid Biopsy: A Survey.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- TNK2 promoted esophageal cancer progression via activating egfr-akt signaling.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effective non-invasive diagnosis and prognosis are critical for cancer treatment. The plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provides a good material for cancer liquid biopsy and its worth in this field is increasingly explored. Here we describe a new pipeline for effectively finding new cfDNA-based biomarkers for cancers by combining SALP-seq and machine learning. Using the pipeline, 30 cfDNA samples from 26 esophageal cancer (ESCA) patients and 4 healthy people were analyzed as an example. As a result, 103 epigenetic markers (including 54 genome-wide and 49 promoter markers) and 37 genetic markers were identified for this cancer. These markers provide new biomarkers for ESCA diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. Importantly, these markers, especially epigenetic markers, not only shed important new insights on the regulatory mechanisms of this cancer, but also could be used to classify the cfDNA samples. We therefore developed a new pipeline for effectively finding new cfDNA-based biomarkers for cancers by combining SALP-seq and machine learning. In this study, we also discovered new clinical worth of cfDNA distinct from other reported characters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.