Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774745›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020

A novel reduction device for the minimally invasive treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Wei Jiang, Yan Lin, Ronak Naveenchandra Kotian, Wen-Qing Xie, Yu-Sheng Li, Guang-Heng Li, Xin-Jia Hu, Jin-Hu Xie, Wen-Tao Liu, Xiao-Ming Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incidence of complications and functional outcomes following segmental femoral shaft fractures: a critical review of the literature.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wei JiangDepartment of Bone and Joint, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfan University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Yan LinDepartment of Bone and Joint, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfan University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Ronak Naveenchandra KotianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute Bangalore, India.
Wen-Qing XieDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University Xiangya Road 87, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Yu-Sheng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University Xiangya Road 87, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Guang-Heng LiDepartment of Bone and Joint, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfan University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Xin-Jia HuDepartment of Bone and Joint, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfan University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Jin-Hu XieDepartment of Bone and Joint, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfan University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Wen-Tao LiuDepartment of Bone and Joint, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfan University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Xiao-Ming ZhangDepartment of Bone and Joint, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfan University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University Shenzhen 518020, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNBangalore Medical College and Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this study, a new type of reduction device for femoral shaft fractures was developed and designed. The reduction procedure was also standardized and is expected to be useful in clinical practice.

methodsA bone traction retractor that consisted of a special traction needle, a resistant sleeve, a crossbar and an arc-adjusting bar was designed. Forty-eight patients (32 males and 16 females, mean age 33.21±7.03 years old) with femoral shaft fractures treated in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were selected. According to the AO classification, there were 15 patients with type A, 24 patients with type B and 9 patients with type C fractures. All patients were treated with transverse bone traction for closed reduction of femoral shaft fractures and femoral reconstruction with intramedullary nails for final fixation. The injured side, preoperative delay time, reduction and operative times, operative blood loss, drilling frequency, number of open reduction cases, hospitalization days, fracture healing time, postoperative HSS function score and complications were recorded.

resultsAll 48 patients were treated with transverse bone traction using our novel device to obtain reduction. The average time needed for reduction was 19.98±4.66 min. The operating time was 60-100 min, with an average of 78.65±16.81 min, and the average intraoperative blood loss was 131.91±30.22 ml. Open reduction was performed in 8 patients: 1 patient in the experimental group and 7 patients in the control group. The average hospitalization days was 7.78±2.81 days, the fracture healing time was 10 to 15 weeks, with an average of 12.44±2.63 weeks, and the postoperative HSS score was 80-95 points, with an average of 86.52±6.03 points. None of the patients had coxa vara, nonunion, internal fixation failure, infection, nerve injury, limb length discrepancy or other complications.

conclusionIn this study, the transverse bone traction reduction technique and the design of a proprietary reduction device system were proposed, with high clinical application. The transverse bone traction reduction technique has the advantages of simple operation, reliable reduction and limited intraoperative fluoroscopy in the minimally invasive treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Indexed as

closed reductionfemoral shaft fracturelocked intramedullary nailingReduction device

Identifiers

PMID32774745
PMCPMC7407717
OpenAlexW3049598664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.