ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020
De novo cartilage growth after implantation of a 3-D-printed tracheal graft in a porcine model.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D printing as an innovative tool in personalized management of complex airway diseases: a literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Bio-Printed PCL Tracheal Graft in a Large Animal Model: Reproducible Short-Segment Regeneration and Preliminary Upgraded Long-Segment Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Chondrogenesis in primitive tracheal neocartilage: insights from 3D-printed silicone grafts in a large-scale animal model.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Long-Term Survival and Regeneration Following Transplantation of 3D-Printed Biodegradable PCL Tracheal Grafts in Large-Scale Porcine Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Tracheal fistula repair with stent placement after failure of reconstruction with muscle tissue. A lung cancer surgery complication.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExperiments were conducted on the assumption that vivid chondrogenesis would be boosted in vivo following previously preliminary chondrogenesis in a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-rich entire umbilical cord (UC) in vitro.
methodsVirtual 3-D tracheal grafts were generated by using a profile obtained by scanning the native trachea of the listed porcine. Although the ultimate goal was the acquisition of a living specimen beyond a 3-week survival period, the empirical results did not meet our criteria until the 10
resultsThree animals died due to tracheal complications: one died from graft crush, and two died secondary to erosion of the larger graft into the great vessels. It appeared that the remaining 7 died of tracheal stenosis from granulation tissue. Ectopic de novo growth of neocartilage was found in three porcine subjects. In the nearby tissues, we detected neocartilage near the anastomosis containing interim vesicles of the vascular canals (VCs), perichondrial papillae (PPs) and preresorptive layers (PRLs), which were investigated during the infancy of cartilage development and were first unveiled in the tracheal cartilage.
conclusions3-D-printed anatomically precise grafts could not provide successful transplantation with stent-sparing anastomosis; nonetheless, de novo cartilage regeneration in situ appears to be promising for tracheal graft adaptability. Further graft refinement and strategies for managing granulated tissues are still needed to improve graft outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32774730PMC7407736W3049524038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.