ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2020
[Tolerablity of everolimus in clinical practice: a retrospective study].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Everolimus is a mTOR inhibitor which demonstrates clinical activity in several solid tumors, especially in kidney cancer after first line TKI anti VEGF treatment and in breast cancer in association with exemesthane after failure of aroamatase inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to analyze in clinical practice the tolerance of everolimus in patients with breast cancer and kidney cancer. We conducted a retrospective study on patients followed up for breast cancer and kidney cancer over the period January 2008 - January 2015. All patients received everolimus at a dosage of 10 mg/day alone or in association with exemesthane for breast cancer. Adverse reactions were classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverses version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE). A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study: 76 patients with breast cancer and 24 patients with kidney cancer. The median follow-up period was 5.7 months. Treatment was stopped in more than 70% of the cases because of intolerance. The main adverse events, with a prevalence of more than 30% for all grades were mucositis, rash, fatigue, anemia, lymphopenia, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidemia and infections. Mucositis, noninfectious pneumopathies and infections had high incidence of toxicity grade 3-4. Treatment discontinuation rate due to intolerance is high compared to literature data. At the beginning of treatment, particular attention should be given to mucositis, the immunosuppressive effect of treatment and non-infectious pneumopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.