Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774338›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Genomic Prediction of Agronomic Traits in Common Bean (

Beat Keller, Daniel Ariza-Suarez, Juan de la Hoz, Johan Steven Aparicio, Ana Elisabeth Portilla-Benavides, Hector Fabio Buendia, Victor Manuel Mayor, Bruno Studer, Bodo Raatz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genomic Prediction of Adaptation in Common Bean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Beat KellerBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Daniel Ariza-SuarezBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Juan de la HozBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Johan Steven AparicioBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Ana Elisabeth Portilla-BenavidesBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Hector Fabio BuendiaBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Victor Manuel MayorBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.
Bruno StuderMolecular Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bodo RaatzBean Program, Agrobiodiversity Area, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plant and animal breeding, genomic prediction models are established to select new lines based on genomic data, without the need for laborious phenotyping. Prediction models can be trained on recent or historic phenotypic data and increasingly available genotypic data. This enables the adoption of genomic selection also in under-used legume crops such as common bean. Beans are an important staple food in the tropics and mainly grown by smallholders under limiting environmental conditions such as drought or low soil fertility. Therefore, genotype-by-environment interactions (G × E) are an important consideration when developing new bean varieties. However, G × E are often not considered in genomic prediction models nor are these models implemented in current bean breeding programs. Here we show the prediction abilities of four agronomic traits in common bean under various environmental stresses based on twelve field trials. The dataset includes 481 elite breeding lines characterized by 5,820 SNP markers. Prediction abilities over all twelve trials ranged between 0.6 and 0.8 for yield and days to maturity, respectively, predicting new lines into new seasons. In all four evaluated traits, the prediction abilities reached about 50-80% of the maximum accuracies given by phenotypic correlations and heritability. Predictions under drought and low phosphorus stress were up to 10 and 20% improved when G × E were included in the model, respectively. Our results demonstrate the potential of genomic selection to increase the genetic gain in common bean breeding. Prediction abilities improved when more phenotypic data was available and G × E could be accounted for. Furthermore, the developed models allowed us to predict genotypic performance under different environmental stresses. This will be a key factor in the development of common bean varieties adapted to future challenging conditions.

Indexed as

common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)droughtgenome-wide association studies (GWAS)genomic selectiongenotype × environment interactionslow phosphorus stressplant breeding

Identifiers

PMID32774338
PMCPMC7381332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.