Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774307›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Sinoatrial Node Structure, Mechanics, Electrophysiology and the Chronotropic Response to Stretch in Rabbit and Mouse.

Eilidh A MacDonald, Josef Madl, Joachim Greiner, Ahmed F Ramadan, Sarah M Wells, Angelo G Torrente, Peter Kohl, Eva A Rog-Zielinska, T Alexander Quinn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Emerging Regulatory Mechanisms in Sinoatrial Node Automaticity.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Modulation of Redox-Sensitive Cardiac Ion Channels.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Physiological Roles of the Rapidly Activated Delayed Rectifier KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eilidh A MacDonaldDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Josef MadlInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Joachim GreinerInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ahmed F RamadanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sarah M WellsSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Angelo G TorrenteDepartment of Physiology, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France.
Peter KohlInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Eva A Rog-ZielinskaInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
T Alexander QuinnDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle · FR

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/3/31047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rhythmic electrical activity of the heart's natural pacemaker, the sinoatrial node (SAN), determines cardiac beating rate (BR). SAN electrical activity is tightly controlled by multiple factors, including tissue stretch, which may contribute to adaptation of BR to changes in venous return. In most animals, including human, there is a robust increase in BR when the SAN is stretched. However, the chronotropic response to sustained stretch differs in mouse SAN, where it causes variable responses, including decreased BR. The reasons for this species difference are unclear. They are thought to relate to dissimilarities in SAN electrophysiology (particularly action potential morphology) between mouse and other species and to how these interact with subcellular stretch-activated mechanisms. Furthermore, species-related differences in structural and mechanical properties of the SAN may influence the chronotropic response to SAN stretch. Here we assess (i) how the BR response to sustained stretch of rabbit and mouse isolated SAN relates to tissue stiffness, (ii) whether structural differences could account for observed differences in BR responsiveness to stretch, and (iii) whether pharmacological modification of mouse SAN electrophysiology alters stretch-induced chronotropy. We found disparities in the relationship between SAN stiffness and the

Indexed as

caveolaecollagencomputational modelingelectron tomographyheart ratemechano-electric couplingsecond-harmonic generation microscopytissue stiffness

Identifiers

PMID32774307
PMCPMC7388775
OpenAlexW3044206167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.