Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774219›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Factors Impacting on Decision-Making towards Prophylactic Surgeries in

Robin Segerer, Clara Peschel, Ulrike Kämmerer, Sebastian Häussler, Achim Wöckel, Sabine Segerer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robin SegererInstitut für Psychologie, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Clara PeschelKlinikum Stuttgart - Krankenhaus Bad Cannstatt, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ulrike KämmererUniversitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sebastian HäusslerBarmherzige Brüder Klinik St. Hedwig, Regensburg, Germany.
Achim WöckelUniversitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sabine Segereramedes experts, Hamburg, Germany.
Amedes MVZ Hamburg · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DEKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectives

methodsNinety-five women with

resultsSeventy-one of the patients opted for an increased surveillance only, 21 for prophylactic surgeries. Positive predictors for prophylactic surgeries were sociodemographic characteristics such as parity and objective variables such as verified mutation status. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that the need for safety in health issues has been the only significant psychological predictor of surgery beyond the objective factors. Fear of surgical procedures, menopausal symptoms after surgery, loss of attractiveness, or fear of interferences with sexual life did not significantly affect decision-making.

conclusionDecision-making towards prophylactic surgeries is influenced by objective but also emotional factors. Knowing that fear and anxiety also have an important impact on decision-making, distinct counselling about the procedures, the subsequent risk reduction as well as the psychological effects of prophylactic surgeries are essential.

Indexed as

BRCABreast cancerHereditary breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID32774219
PMCPMC7383262
OpenAlexW2978350452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.