ReviewBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Biology of the Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Immunohistochemical, RNA, and DNA Features.
Review in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Association of gene variant type and location with breast cancer risk in the general population.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025Article
- Harnessing the Power of Metabolomics for Precision Oncology: Current Advances and Future Directions.Cells · 2025Review
- Prognostic and Clinical Significance of PD-L1, EGFR and Androgen Receptor (AR) Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prognostic Value of Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in an Unselected Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Identifying High-Risk Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Molecular Subtyping.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Tackling the Biological Diversity in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes a heterogeneous disease with an aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. A better understanding of its biology is required to identify new biomarkers and improve clinical outcomes. SUMMARY: To date, the definition and classification of TNBC depends on a multiomic approach including immunohistochemistry (IHC), genomic, and transcriptomic features, and the tumor immune landscape. The development of new technologies has allowed us to sequence the whole cancer genome. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and next-generation sequencing have led to a greater knowledge of DNA alterations such as TP53 or BRCA mutations, copy number variations, and DNA methylations. In addition, gene expression profiling has allowed to define a molecular intrinsic classification of TNBC based on mRNA. IHC and genomic profiling are also necessary to identify new immune biomarkers such as the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. KEY MESSAGES: This review aimed to provide recent knowledge of TNBC biology and classification focused on IHC, transcriptomics, genomic features, and the new immune biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.