ArticleBMC nursing2020
Self-assessed competence and need for further training among registered nurses in somatic hospital wards in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nurse core competency cultivation using the checklist-based Kirkpatrick model under the "cross-departmental bed-sharing" mode.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Newly Graduated Nurses' Experiences of Taking Responsibility for Safe Nursing Care in Their First Year in Connection to COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Nurses' Self-Reported Professional Competence: A Cross-Sectional Study at a Regional Teaching Hospital in Sweden.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Graduating Nursing Students' Self-Assessment of Clinical Competence and Need for Further Training: A Nordic Cross- Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of an Interactive Web-Based Clinical Practice Monitoring System on Enhancing Motivation in Clinical Learning Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: Longitudinal Quasi-Experimental Study in Tanzania.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- A Dynamic Interaction: Supervisors' Reasoning About Nursing Students' Conditions for Learning and Development of Clinical Competence. A Focus Group Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Structural Validity and Internal Consistency of the Professional Nurse Self-Assessment A-Scale (II) for Measuring Clinical Competence Among Graduating Nordic Nursing Students.Nursing research and practice · 2025Article
- Self-reported competence among advanced practice nursing students in Denmark, Finland and Norway: a cross-sectional multicentre study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Perceived clinical competence and its related factors among registered nurses employed at selected outpatient clinics in Egypt.PloS one · 2024Article
- Person-Centeredness in Digital Primary Healthcare Services-A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nurses' professional competencies in urgency and emergency units: A mixed-methods study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Healthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence: A qualitative descriptive study.Nursing open · 2022Article
- Nurse competence in the post-anaesthesia care unit in Sweden: a qualitative study of the nurse's perspective.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Clinical learning opportunity in public academic hospitals: A concept analysis.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2022Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Slovenian version of the nurse professional competence scale.BMC nursing · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProfessional competence and continuous professional development is essential for ensuring high quality and safe nursing care, and it might be important for motivating nurses to stay in the profession. Thus, there is a need to identify the developmental process of nursing competency. Assessment of competence and need for further training helps to identify areas for quality improvement, and to design interventions in order to facilitate continuous competence development in different work contexts. The current study aimed to 1) describe registered nurses' self-assessment of clinical competence as well as the need for further training, and 2) explore possible differences between registered nurses with varying lengths of professional experience as a nurse (≤ 0,5 year, > 0,5-5 years, and ≥ 6 years).
methodsA cross-sectional survey design was applied, using the Professional Nurse Self-Assessment Scale of clinical core competencies II. Registered nurses (
resultsRegistered nurses assessed their competence highest in statements related to cooperation with other health professionals; taking full responsibility for own activities; and acting ethically when caring for patients. They assessed their need for further training most for statements related to assessing patients' health needs by telephone; giving health promotion advice and recommendations to patients by telephone; as well as improving a creative learning environment for staff at the workplace. For self-assessed competence and need for further training, differences between the groups for 35 and 46 items respectively, out of 50 were statistically significant.
conclusionsAlthough the registered nurses assessed their competence high for important competence components expected of professionals such as cooperation with other healthcare professionals, it is problematic that knowledge of interactions and side-effects of different types of medication were reported as having the highest need of training. Longitudinal follow up of newly graduated nurses regarding their continuous development of competence as well as further training is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.