Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774085›Full record

ReviewSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2018

Surgical Treatment in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.

Fatih Tunca, İsmail Cem Sormaz, Ahmet Yalın İşcan, Yasemin Giles Şenyürek

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fatih TuncaDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
İsmail Cem SormazDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Yalın İşcanDepartment of General Surgery, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Yasemin Giles ŞenyürekDepartment of General Surgery, İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the notable increasing incidence of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), the optimal treatment of the patients with PTMC remains controversial. Because of no consensus about its treatment, the suggested treatment varies from active surveillance alone to total thyroidectomy. Although the 2015 revised American Thyroid Association guideline recommends hemithyroidectomy as the first-line treatment, active surveillance has also been discussed and accepted as another approach for the patients with PTMC. However, the same guideline does not recommend fine needle aspiration biopsy for nodules sized <1 cm, even it is suspicious. In such situation, neither active surveillance nor hemithyroidectomy could be discussed, with a lack of objective cytologic data about the nodules sized <1 cm. In this situation, the decision to perform FNAB to the nodules <1 cm in size depends on the performer of the thyroid ultrasonography. In this invited review, we have discussed the diagnosis and prognostic factors for PTMCs. We have also discussed surgical strategies as the accepted the first-line treatment in patients with PTMC.

Indexed as

Papillary thyroid microcarcinomasurgery

Identifiers

PMID32774085
PMCPMC7406556
OpenAlexW2904486808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.