ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2020
3D CT scan-based study of glenoid morphology in Indian population: Clinical relevance in design of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Average Indian Glenoid Sizes Are Smaller than All Commercially Available Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Three Dimensional Anthropometric Analysis of Glenoid Anatomy in Normal Indian Population.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Article
- The study of 2-dimensional computed tomography scans of the glenoid anatomy in relation to reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the Southern Chinese population.JSES international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe knowledge of normal anatomy of glenoid in a population has relevance in terms of comparison with other regional and national population. Furthermore, it could enable clinicians to judge whether the available sizes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthesis could provide optimal fit for the glenoid in Indian patients.
methodsWe evaluated consecutive 200 3-dimensional chest CT scans of 50 male and 50 female patients which included both shoulder joints and done for non-orthopaedic diseases at a tertiary care institute. The glenoid height, width, and version were measured using commercially available computer program.
resultsMean age of the patents was 38.6 ± 13.8 years (range, 19-59 years). The mean glenoid height was 33.9 ± 3.1 mm and maximum glenoid width was 24.2 ± 2.1 mm. Mean glenoid version in the study population was a retroversion of 3.47 ± 4.7
conclusionsThe normal glenoid size of a large cohort of Indian population studied was smaller than that reported in cohorts from western countries. The glenoid width of substantial proportion of patients, especially female patients, was less than the diameter of smallest available glenoid baseplate. Clinical studies are needed in future in Indian patients undergoing RTSA to evaluate the glenoid bone-baseplate mismatch and ascertain the necessity of development of smaller size glenoid baseplate for optimal prosthesis fit in Indian patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.