ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2020
Management of complex non union of tibia using rail external fixator.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Tibial bone transport using external fixation in adults: a systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Distraction osteogenesis versus induced membrane technique for infected tibial non-unions with segmental bone loss: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of available studies.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Ilizarov External Fixator Versus Orthofix LRS in Management of Femoral Osteomyelitis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Use of locked plates and mono-rail fixator in segmental tibial defects: A prospective interventional study.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Temporary spacer rod and plate technique: a novel intraoperative technical tip for minimizing the docking site malalignment during bone transport for bone loss in Gustilo IIIb open tibial fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- New insights in lower limb reconstruction strategies.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2023Review
- Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionManagement of the complex non union of tibia is a challenging task due to infection, bony gap, deformity, poor bone quality and poor soft tissue cover at fracture site. The limb reconstruction system (LRS) or Rail fixator has emerged as a viable option for the treatment of the same as it can address most of all above problems. It is more patient friendly and easier to apply in comparison to Ilizarov ring fixator. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwenty two patients (17 males and 5 females) with complex non union of tibia underwent thorough debridement and resection of non viable bone followed by bone transport to fill the gap and then lengthening (8 patients) or acute docking & lengthening (14 patients) by the use of rail fixator. The average time to union, bone gap filled, lengthening achieved, treatment index were measured. The bone and functional outcome assessment was done by ASAMI score. The complications were classified according to Paley's classification.
resultsUnion without residual infection was achieved in 20 (90.1%) patients while 2 patients had failure. As per ASAMI criteria bone results were excellent in 12 (54.5%), good in 5 (22.7%), fair in 3 (13.6%) and poor in 2 (9.1%). Functional results were excellent in 11 (50%), good in 5 (22.72%), fair in 4 (18.18%) and failure in 2 (9%). Mean treatment duration was 8.2 months (range 7-19 months). Mean follow up duration was 11.3 months (range - 8.3 to 22 months). Average lengthening achieved was 4 cm (0-9 cm). Treatment index was 2.1 month/cm.
conclusionThe monolateral rail fixator is simple, effective, easier to apply and more patient compliant with acceptable functional and radiological outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.