Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774032›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2020

Management of complex non union of tibia using rail external fixator.

Latif Zafar Jilani, Ziaul Hoda Shaan, Rajesh Ranjan, Mohd Faizan, Sohail Ahmad, Naiyer Asif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New insights in lower limb reconstruction strategies.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Latif Zafar JilaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, 202002, India.
Ziaul Hoda ShaanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, 202002, India.
Rajesh RanjanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, 202002, India.
Mohd FaizanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, 202002, India.
Sohail AhmadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, 202002, India.
Naiyer AsifDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, 202002, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManagement of the complex non union of tibia is a challenging task due to infection, bony gap, deformity, poor bone quality and poor soft tissue cover at fracture site. The limb reconstruction system (LRS) or Rail fixator has emerged as a viable option for the treatment of the same as it can address most of all above problems. It is more patient friendly and easier to apply in comparison to Ilizarov ring fixator. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwenty two patients (17 males and 5 females) with complex non union of tibia underwent thorough debridement and resection of non viable bone followed by bone transport to fill the gap and then lengthening (8 patients) or acute docking & lengthening (14 patients) by the use of rail fixator. The average time to union, bone gap filled, lengthening achieved, treatment index were measured. The bone and functional outcome assessment was done by ASAMI score. The complications were classified according to Paley's classification.

resultsUnion without residual infection was achieved in 20 (90.1%) patients while 2 patients had failure. As per ASAMI criteria bone results were excellent in 12 (54.5%), good in 5 (22.7%), fair in 3 (13.6%) and poor in 2 (9.1%). Functional results were excellent in 11 (50%), good in 5 (22.72%), fair in 4 (18.18%) and failure in 2 (9%). Mean treatment duration was 8.2 months (range 7-19 months). Mean follow up duration was 11.3 months (range - 8.3 to 22 months). Average lengthening achieved was 4 cm (0-9 cm). Treatment index was 2.1 month/cm.

conclusionThe monolateral rail fixator is simple, effective, easier to apply and more patient compliant with acceptable functional and radiological outcome.

Indexed as

Bone transportComplex non-unionCorticotomyLimb reconstruction systemRail fixatorTibia

Identifiers

PMID32774032
PMCPMC7394815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.