Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32774027›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2020

Risk of bony violation with standard triple screw configurations for fixation of femoral neck fractures: A preliminary computed tomography based analysis.

Vivek Trikha, Arvind Kumar, Samarth Mittal, Jigyasa Passey, Dushyant Chouhan, Siddharth Dubey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Analysis of effectiveness of Holosight robot navigation-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation in treatment of femoral neck fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. In-out-in screws in femoral neck fractures: Can they be avoided?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vivek TrikhaJPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arvind KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India.
Samarth MittalJPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jigyasa PasseyDepartment of Anatomy, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Dushyant ChouhanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Siddharth DubeyJPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INJamia Hamdard · INLady Hardinge Medical College · INMaulana Azad Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe reduction and fixation of femoral neck fractures is mainly an indirect one with intraoperative fluoroscopy being trusted for the safe containment of screws within the bony limits of the femoral neck. Radiologically undetected bony perforations may have an impact on the fracture stability and radiological outcomes that have not been studied previously. The purpose of this computed tomography (CT) based study is to analyze the safety of containment of triple screw configurations using standard 6.5 mm diameter screws for fixation of femoral neck fractures in the Indian population using a software-based analysis.

methodsData from consecutive CT scans with intact proximal femur performed over a six month period were retrospectively analyzed using iPlan® BrainLab AG, Feldkirchen, Germany. The safe containment of virtual screw trajectories placed in inverted triangular and non-inverted triangular configurations for a 6.5 mm diameter screw was analyzed in intact femoral necks.

resultsA total of 72 cases were considered for the final assessment. For 6.5 mm screws, the proportion for safe containment (without bony violation) of triple screw inverted triangular configuration was 75% with additional safety corridor to 1 mm around the screw trajectories and 31.94% for non-inverted triangular configuration. All male cases and 28% of female cases allowed safe placement of three 6.5 mm screw trajectories in an inverted triangular pattern with a safety margin of 1 mm around the screw. Replacement of one of the two superior 6.5 mm diameter screw trajectories with a 4.5 mm diameter trajectory resulted in 100% safe containment in female cases.

conclusionInverted triangular configuration is a relatively safer configuration compared to the non-inverted triangular configuration. Standard triple 6.5 mm screws for fixation of femoral neck fractures carry a risk of bony violation, especially in females. A preoperative radiographic assessment to screen the cases with narrow vertical and anteroposterior extents of the femoral neck can help in reducing the risk of fluoroscopically undetected violation of the bony margins. Replacement of one of the two superior screws with a 4.5 mm diameter screw can be helpful in such cases.

Indexed as

Femoral neck fracturesFemoral neck morphologyScrew fixationScrew safety

Identifiers

PMID32774027
PMCPMC7394785
OpenAlexW3020834354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.