Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32773976›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology

Evaluation of diode laser along with 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on dentinal tubule occlusion: An

Praveen Jayaram, Amita Olivia Coutinho, Abhishek Bhadranna, Anirban Chatterjee, Vinayak Raghunathan, Faizuddin Imran

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In vitro comparative evaluation of physical and chemical properties of surface enamel after using APF and SDF with or without laser activation.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2023
    Article
  3. Maedica · 2023
    Article
  4. AnJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Praveen JayaramDepartment of Periodontics, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Amita Olivia CoutinhoDepartment of Periodontics, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Abhishek BhadrannaResident Dentist, Adi's Dantalaya Dental Clinic, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Anirban ChatterjeeDepartment of Periodontics, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vinayak RaghunathanDepartment of Periodontics, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Faizuddin ImranDepartment of Periodontics, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Oxford Dental College and Hospital · INChristie's · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSeveral studies have recommended the use of lasers in treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. These materials have been used alone or in combination with an active desensitizing agent.

aimsThe present study aimed to evaluate the use of 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel and 810 nm diode laser when used alone and when used together on exposed dentinal tubules. SETTINGS AND

designSixty-one extracted teeth were sectioned with a diamond saw and dentin slices were prepared. They were then treated with 37% orthophosphoric acid to remove the smear layer. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne of the 61 sections was left as an untreated control, whereas the remaining sixty sections were divided into three groups of twenty sections each. The first set of sections (Group 1) was treated with laser alone, whereas the second set (Group 2) was treated with APF alone. A third set of sections (Group 3) was treated with a combination of laser and APF. The sectioned teeth were then evaluated using field emission scanning electron microscopy, and the percentage of dentinal tubule occlusion was observed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was performed to check for the normal distribution of data, whereas the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the mean percentage of dentinal tubule occlusion between the three groups. The Chi-square test was used to compare the number of images with complete tubular occlusion between the three groups.

resultsA total of 96 images were processed from the sixty sectioned samples. It was seen that the sections in Group 3 showed the highest percentage of dentinal tubule occlusion. Group 3 also showed the highest number of samples with complete dentinal tubule occlusion. Significantly lesser levels of dentinal tubule occlusion were seen in Groups 1 and 2.

conclusionsDiode lasers were effective in occluding dentinal tubules. The addition of 1.23% APF significantly increased the efficacy and thoroughness of dentinal tubule occlusion. Significantly lesser levels of dentinal tubule occlusion were seen in the sections treated with laser alone and APF alone.

Indexed as

Acidulated phosphate fluoridedentinal hypersensitivitylasers

Identifiers

PMID32773976
PMCPMC7307474
OpenAlexW3043994422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.