Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32773922›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique2019

Synthetic data method to incorporate external information into a current study.

Tian Gu, Jeremy M G Taylor, Wenting Cheng, Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mediation with External Summary Statistic Information.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Integrating Information from Existing Risk Prediction Models with No Model Details.The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tian GuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, U.S.A.
Jeremy M G TaylorDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, U.S.A.
Wenting ChengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, U.S.A.
Bhramar MukherjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, U.S.A.

Funding

Biostatistics Training Program in Cancer ResearchT32CA083654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Kelley McLain Kidwell · 2002 to 2026
$4.3M
Statistical Methods for Cancer BiomarkersR01CA129102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHOSH, DEBASHIS, TAYLOR, JEREMY M.G. · 2009 to 2021
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129102NCI NIH HHS T32 CA083654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the situation where there is a known regression model that can be used to predict an outcome, Y, from a set of predictor variables

Indexed as

constrained maximum likelihooddata integrationprediction modelsSynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID32773922
PMCPMC7410329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.