ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2020
Core outcomes sets for studies evaluating critical illness and patient recovery.
Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges and Recommendations for Integrating Circadian Medicine in Critical Care: A Roadmap.Chest · 2026Guideline
- Exploring the effectiveness of eHealth interventions in treating Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) outcomes: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Psychometric properties of health-related quality of life instruments used in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Core outcome measures for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness: an international modified Delphi consensus study evaluation (CONCISE).Critical care (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Effects on health-related quality of life of interventions affecting survival in critically ill patients: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes with haloperidol versus placebo in acutely admitted adult ICU patients with delirium.Intensive care medicine · 2024Trial
- Mental Health Outcomes After Neurocritical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Developing a Core Outcome Measurement Set for Adult ICU Patients, the CoreMS-ICU-A Protocol.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Intravenous amino acid for kidney protection: current understanding and future perspectives.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- How are Long-Covid, Post-Sepsis-Syndrome and Post-Intensive-Care-Syndrome related? A conceptional approach based on the current research literature.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: recent advances in enrichment strategies, sub-phenotyping and clinical trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- Evidence gaps in conservative non-pharmacological interventions and guideline implementation for high-burden non-communicable diseases: protocol for an overview of reviews.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2024Article
- Physical function measures in ICU survivors, where to now? A scoping review.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2024Article
- Changes in Restricting Symptoms after Critical Illness among Community-Living Older Adults.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- The sit-to-stand test as a patient-centered functional outcome for critical care research: a pooled analysis of five international rehabilitation studies.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Article
- Determining the Prevalence, Implementation Approaches, and Opinions of Above Cuff Vocalization: A Survey of Health Care Professionals.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Observational
- Barriers and facilitators to the conduct of critical care research in low and lower-middle income countries: A scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
- What intensive care registries can teach us about outcomes.Current opinion in critical care · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewGiven the growing body of critical care clinical research publications, core outcome sets (COSs) are important to help mitigate heterogeneity in outcomes assessed and measurement instruments used, and have potential to reduce research waste. This article provides an update on COS projects in critical care medicine, and related resources and tools for COS developers. RECENT
findingsWe identified 28 unique COS projects, of which 15 have published results as of May 2020. COS topics relevant to critical care medicine include mechanical ventilation, cardiology, stroke, rehabilitation, and long-term outcomes (LTOs) after critical illness. There are four COS projects for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with a 'meta-COS' summarizing common outcomes across these projects. To help facilitate COS development, there are existing resources, standards, guidelines, and tools available from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (www.comet-initiative.org/) and the National Institutes of Health-funded Improve LTO project (www.improvelto.com/). SUMMARY: Many COS projects have been completed in critical care, with more on-going COS projects, including foci from across the spectrum of acute critical care, COVID-19, critical care rehabilitation, and patient recovery and LTOs. Extensive resources are accessible to help facilitate rigorous COS development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.