Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32773215›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of anaesthesia2020

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on anaesthesia trainees and their training.

John R Sneyd, Sophie E Mathoulin, Ellen P O'Sullivan, Vincent C So, Fiona R Roberts, Aaron A Paul, Luis I Cortinez, Russell S Ampofo, Caitlynn J Miller, Maxine A Balkisson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Student advanced trauma management and skills (SATMAS): a validation study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Critical care and pandemic preparedness and response.British journal of anaesthesia · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

John R SneydPeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. Electronic address: robert.sneyd@pms.ac.uk.
Sophie E MathoulinDepartment of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Ellen P O'SullivanDepartment of Anaesthesia, St James' Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Vincent C SoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Fiona R RobertsDepartment of Anaesthesia, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Aaron A PaulDepartment of Anaesthesia, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Luis I CortinezDepartment of Anesthesia, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Russell S AmpofoDepartment of Education, Training and Examinations, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
Caitlynn J MillerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Maxine A BalkissonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GBPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLQueen Mary Hospital · CNRoyal College of Anaesthetists · GBSt. James's Hospital · IESt. Vincent's University Hospital · IEThe Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust · GBUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2] has dislocated clinical services and postgraduate training. To better understand and to document these impacts, we contacted anaesthesia trainees and trainers across six continents and collated their experiences during the pandemic. All aspects of training programmes have been affected. Trainees report that reduced caseload, sub-specialty experience, and supervised procedures are impairing learning. Cancelled educational activities, postponed examinations, and altered rotations threaten progression through training. Job prospects and international opportunities are downgraded. Work-related anxieties about provision of personal protective equipment, and risks to self and to colleagues are superimposed on concerns for family and friends and domestic disruption. These seismic changes have had consequences for well-being and mental health. In response, anaesthetists have developed innovations in teaching and trainee support. New technologies support trainer-trainee interactions, with a focus on e-learning. National training bodies and medical regulators that specify training and oversee assessment of trainees and their progression have provided flexibility in their requirements. Within anaesthesia departments, support transcends grades and job titles with lessons for the future. Attention to wellness, awareness of mental health issues and multimodal support can attenuate but not eliminate trainee distress.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAnesthesiologyAnesthetistsAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19CurriculumDiagnosis-Related GroupsEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansMental HealthPersonal Protective EquipmentStudents, MedicalTeachinganaesthesiaCOVID-19medical educationmental healthpostgraduate medical educationSARS-CoV-2trainingwell-being

Identifiers

PMID32773215
PMCPMC7377727
OpenAlexW3044739349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.