Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32773211›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection and public health2020

A retrospective cross-national examination of COVID-19 outbreak in 175 countries: a multiscale geographically weighted regression analysis (January 11-June 28, 2020).

Ayodeji Emmanuel Iyanda, Richard Adeleke, Yongmei Lu, Tolulope Osayomi, Adeleye Adaralegbe, Mayowa Lasode, Ngozi J Chima-Adaralegbe, Adedoyin M Osundina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayodeji Emmanuel IyandaDepartment of Geography, Texas State University, San Marco, TX, United States. Electronic address: aei11@txtstate.edu.
Richard AdelekeDepartment of Geography, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Yongmei LuDepartment of Geography, Texas State University, San Marco, TX, United States.
Tolulope OsayomiDepartment of Geography, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Adeleye AdaralegbeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Health Services, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.
Mayowa LasodeDepartment of Geography, Texas State University, San Marco, TX, United States.
Ngozi J Chima-AdaralegbeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Health Services, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.
Adedoyin M OsundinaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University College Hospital, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Texas State University · USUniversity of Ibadan · NGUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study retrospectively examined the health and social determinants of the COVID-19 outbreak in 175 countries from a spatial epidemiological approach.

methodsWe used spatial analysis to examine the cross-national determinants of confirmed cases of COVID-19 based on the World Health Organization official COVID-19 data and the World Bank Indicators of Interest to the COVID-19 outbreak. All models controlled for COVID-19 government measures.

resultsThe percentage of the population age between 15-64 years (Age15-64), percentage smokers (SmokTot.), and out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPExp) significantly explained global variation in the current COVID-19 outbreak in 175 countries. The percentage population age group 15-64 and out of pocket expenditure were positively associated with COVID-19. Conversely, the percentage of the total population who smoke was inversely associated with COVID-19 at the global level.

conclusionsThis study is timely and could serve as a potential geospatial guide to developing public health and epidemiological surveillance programs for the outbreak in multiple countries. Removal of catastrophic medical expenditure, smoking cessation, and observing public health guidelines will not only reduce illness related to COVID-19 but also prevent unecessary deaths.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Databases, FactualHealth ExpendituresHumansMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SmokingCOVID-19geovisualizationmedical geographymultiscale modelSARS-CoV-2social-health determinants

Identifiers

PMID32773211
PMCPMC7375316
OpenAlexW3045423387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.