Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772891›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2020

A systems approach to assessing complexity in health interventions: an effectiveness decay model for integrated community case management.

Aliya Karim, Daniel Cobos Munoz, Daniel Mäusezahl, Don de Savigny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aliya KarimDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) , Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3665-217X
Daniel Cobos MunozDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) , Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5920-1304
Daniel MäusezahlDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) , Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5639-5337
Don de SavignyDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) , Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-4722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complexity is inherent to any system or program. This is especially true of integrated interventions, such as integrated community case management (iCCM). iCCM is a child health strategy designed to provide services through community health workers (CHWs) within hard-to-reach areas of low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). It is comprised of many interlinked program components, processes and stakeholders. Elucidating the complexity of such programs is essential to designing interventions that respond to local contexts and successfully plan for sustainable integration. A pragmatic approach has yet to be developed that holistically assesses the many dimensions of iCCM or other integrated programs, their alignment with local systems, and how well they provide effective care. We propose an accessible systems approach to both measuring systems effectiveness and assessing its underlying complexity using a combination of systems thinking tools. We propose an effectiveness decay model for iCCM implementation to measure where patient loss occurs along the trajectory of care. The approach uses process mapping to examine critical bottlenecks of iCCM processes, their influence on effectiveness decay, and their integration into local systems; regression analysis and structural equation modeling to determine effects of key indicators on programmatic outcomes; and qualitative analysis with causal loop diagramming to assess stakeholder dynamics and their interactions within the iCCM program. An accurate assessment of the quality, effectiveness, and strength of community-based interventions relies on more than measuring core indicators and program outcomes; it requires an exploration of how its actors and core components interact as part of a system. Our approach produces an interactive iCCM effectiveness decay model to understand patient loss in context, examines key systems issues, and uses a range of systems thinking tools to assess the dynamic interactions that coalesce to produce observed program outcomes.

Indexed as

Case ManagementChild Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersChildChild HealthHumansSystems Analysisbottleneck analysisdata visualizationiCCMprocess mappingsankey diagramsystems thinking tools

Identifiers

PMID32772891
PMCPMC7480477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.