Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772801›Full record

ArticleCirculation research2020

Epigenomic and Transcriptomic Dynamics During Human Heart Organogenesis.

Jennifer VanOudenhove, Tara N Yankee, Andrea Wilderman, Justin Cotney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. In-Depth Genomic Analysis: The New Challenge in Congenital Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer VanOudenhove *Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT (J.V., T.N.Y., A.W., J.C.).
Tara N Yankee *Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT (J.V., T.N.Y., A.W., J.C.).
Andrea WildermanDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT (J.V., T.N.Y., A.W., J.C.).
Justin CotneyDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT (J.V., T.N.Y., A.W., J.C.).
UConn Health · USJoint Center for Structural Genomics · US

Funding

Unraveling mechanisms of genome regulation to understand and improvehuman healthR35GM119465 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI COTNEY, JUSTIN LEE · 2016 to 2025
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThere is growing evidence that common variants and rare sequence alterations in regulatory sequences can result in birth defects or predisposition to disease. Congenital heart defects are the most common birth defect and have a clear genetic component, yet only a third of cases can be attributed to structural variation in the genome or a mutation in a gene. The remaining unknown cases could be caused by alterations in regulatory sequences.

objectiveIdentify regulatory sequences and gene expression networks that are active during organogenesis of the human heart. Determine whether these sites and networks are enriched for disease-relevant genes and associated genetic variation. METHODS AND

resultsWe characterized ChromHMM (chromatin state) and gene expression dynamics during human heart organogenesis. We profiled 7 histone modifications in embryonic hearts from each of 9 distinct Carnegie stages (13-14, 16-21, and 23), annotated chromatin states, and compared these maps to over 100 human tissues and cell types. We also generated RNA-sequencing data, performed differential expression, and constructed weighted gene coexpression networks. We identified 177 412 heart enhancers; 12 395 had not been previously annotated as strong enhancers. We identified 92% of all functionally validated heart-positive enhancers (n=281; 7.5× enrichment;

conclusionsWell-connected hub genes with heart-specific expression targeted by embryonic heart-specific enhancers are likely disease candidates. Our functional annotations will allow for better interpretation of whole genome sequencing data in the large number of patients affected by congenital heart defects.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticGene Regulatory NetworksRegulatory Sequences, Ribonucleic AcidChromatinEpigenomicsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic VariationHeartHeart Defects, CongenitalHistone CodeHomeobox Protein Nkx-2.5HumansNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelOrganogenesisT-Box Domain ProteinsChromatinHomeobox Protein Nkx-2.5NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNKX2-5 protein, humanRegulatory Sequences, Ribonucleic AcidSCN5A protein, humanT-Box Domain ProteinsT-box transcription factor 5TBX20 protein, humandevelopmental biologydiseaseepigenomicsgeneticsgenomics

Identifiers

PMID32772801
PMCPMC7554226
OpenAlexW3048237829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.