Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772790›Full record

GuidelineLaboratory animals2021

Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations recommendations of best practices for the health management of ruminants and pigs used for scientific and educational purposes.

Felasa Working Group On Farm Animals Corina Mihaela Berset Convenor, Maria Emiliana Caristo, Fabienne Ferrara, Patrick Hardy, Marianne Oropeza-Moe, Ryan Waters

Open access · hybridAbstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Laboratory animals, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Health Monitoring of Laboratory Rodent Colonies-Talking about (R)evolution.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Survey on Sheep Usage in Biomedical Research.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Felasa Working Group On Farm Animals Corina Mihaela Berset ConvenorAnimal Welfare and 3R Department, University of Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-3536
Maria Emiliana CaristoExperimental Research Center, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Italy.
Fabienne FerraraConsulting and Training in Laboratory Animal Science, Germany.
Patrick HardyVeterinary and Professional Services, Allentown France, France.
Marianne Oropeza-MoeNorwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Norway.
Ryan WatersThe Pirbright Institute, UK.
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NOThe Pirbright Institute · GBUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most ruminants and pigs used for scientific and educational aims are bred not for these purposes but in a farm environment. Given the wide range of diseases that these species might have, ensuring that the animals' health status is appropriate can be complex and challenging. The Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations has previously published recommendations for the health monitoring of experimental colonies of pigs (1998) and, respectively, calves, sheep and goats (2000). Unfortunately, the uptake of those recommendations was poor and insufficiently reported in scientific publications. These new recommendations for best practice focus on the main species of ruminants (cattle, sheep and goats) and pigs. They provide general and specific information helpful for designing a health management programme for the suppliers and for the user establishments, as well as guidance on animal procurement. Critical thinking based on the fields of use of the animals is promoted, aiming to help in taking informed decisions rather than establishing an exhaustive exclusion list for pathogens. Implementing the best health and welfare management practices should be done under the guidance of a competent attending veterinarian, with expertise and sufficient authority to take the appropriate action, doubled by excellent communication skills. It is strongly recommended that the user establishment's veterinarian works in close collaboration with the supplier's veterinarian.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryRuminantsSus scrofaAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimal WelfareLaboratory Animal ScienceFELASAhealthorganisms and modelspigsrecommendationsruminants

Identifiers

PMID32772790
PMCPMC8044623
OpenAlexW3048894802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.