Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772613›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2020

Effects of replacing PSA with Stockholm3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in a healthcare system - the Stavanger experience.

Eirik Viste, Cathrine Alvaer Vinje, Torgeir Gilje Lid, Svein Skeie, Øystein Evjen-Olsen, Tobias Nordström, Olav Thorsen, Bjørnar Gilje, Emiel A M Janssen, Svein R Kjosavik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort: Optimizing Prostate Cancer Screening to Reduce Harm and Improve Equity.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. A new approach to prostate cancer screening.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eirik VisteFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Cathrine Alvaer VinjeDepartment of Urology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Torgeir Gilje LidFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Svein SkeieDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Øystein Evjen-OlsenOrganization and Development Unit SUS 2023, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Tobias NordströmDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olav ThorsenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Bjørnar GiljeDepartment of Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Emiel A M JanssenDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Svein R KjosavikFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NOKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe early experience of replacing PSA with Stockholm3 for detection of prostate cancer in primary care. DESIGN AND

methodsLongitudinal observations, comparing outcome measures before and after the implementation of Stockholm3.

settingStavanger region in Norway with about 370,000 inhabitants, 304 general practitioners (GPs) in 97 primary care clinics, and one hospital.

interventionGPs were instructed to use Stockholm3 instead of PSA as standard procedure for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

main outcome measuresProportion of GP clinics that had ordered a Stockholm3 test. Number of men referred to needle biopsy. Distribution of

resultsStockholm3 was rapidly implemented as 91% (88/97) of the clinics started to use the test within 14 weeks. After including 4784 tested men, the percentage who would have been referred for prostate needle biopsy was 29.0% (1387/4784) if based on PSA level ≥3ng/ml, and 20.8% (995/4784) if based on Stockholm3 Risk Score (

conclusionReplacing PSA with Stockholm3 for early detection of prostate cancer in primary care is feasible. Implementation of Stockholm3 resulted in reduced number of referrals for needle-biopsy and a higher proportion of clinically significant prostate cancer findings in performed biopsies. Direct healthcare costs decreased. KEY POINTS A change from PSA to Stockholm3 for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care in the Stavanger region in Norway is described and assessed. •Implementation of a new blood-based test for prostate cancer detection in primary care was feasible. A majority of GP clinics started to use the test within three months. •Implementation of the Stockholm3 test was followed by: -a 28% reduction in number of men referred for urological prostate cancer work-up -an increase in the proportion of clinically significant cancer in performed prostate biopsies from 42 to 65% -an estimated reduction in direct health care costs between 23 and 28%.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyDelivery of Health CareHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingProstate-Specific AntigenDiagnostic methodsfamily medicineGleason scorehealth economyimplementation studyover diagnosisprostate cancerPSAStockholm3

Identifiers

PMID32772613
PMCPMC7470071
OpenAlexW3047873098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.