Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772409›Full record

SynthesisPhotodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine2020

DNA repair enzymes in sunscreens and their impact on photoageing-A systematic review.

Hanna Luze, Sebastian Philipp Nischwitz, Iris Zalaudek, Robert Müllegger, Lars Peter Kamolz

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. DNA repair enzymes in sunscreens and their impact on photoageing-A systematic review.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antarctic MicroalgaMarine drugs · 2026
    Article
  10. Cutaneous Melanoma in the Context of Aging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Counteracting Skin Aging In Vitro by Phytochemicals.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Photolyase Production and Current Applications: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanna LuzeCOREMED-Cooperative Centre for Regenerative Medicine, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-0831
Sebastian Philipp NischwitzCOREMED-Cooperative Centre for Regenerative Medicine, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Graz, Austria.
Iris ZalaudekClinica Dermatologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche e della Salute, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Robert MülleggerDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Federal Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Lars Peter KamolzCOREMED-Cooperative Centre for Regenerative Medicine, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Graz, Austria.
Joanneum Research · ATFachhochschule Wiener Neustadt · ATUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA damage is one of the main factors responsible for photoageing and is predominantly attributed to ultraviolet irradiation (UV-R). Photoprotection by conventional sunscreens is exclusively prophylactic, and of no value, once DNA damage has occurred. As a result, the demand for DNA repair mechanisms inhibiting, reversing or delaying the pathologic events in UV-exposed skin has sparked research on anti-photoageing and strategies to improve the effect of conventional sunscreens. This review provides an overview of recent developments in DNA repair enzymes used in sunscreens and their impact on photoageing.

methodsA systematic review of the literature, up to March 2019, was conducted using the electronic databases, PubMed and Web of Science. Quality assessment was carried out using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) to ensure inclusion of adequate quality studies only (NOS > 5).

resultsOut of the 352 publications, 52 were considered relevant to the key question and included in the present review. Two major enzymes were found to play a major role in DNA damage repair in sunscreens: photolyase and T4 endonuclease V. These enzymes are capable of identifying and removing UV-R-induced dimeric photoproducts. Clinical studies revealed that sunscreens with liposome-encapsulated types of photolyase and/or T4 endonuclease V can enhance these repair mechanisms.

conclusionThere is a lack of randomized controlled trials demonstrating the efficacy of DNA repair enzymes on photoageing, or a superiority of sunscreens with DNA repair enzymes compared to conventional sunscreens. Further studies are mandatory to further reveal pathogenic factors of photoageing and possible therapeutic strategies against it.

Indexed as

AnimalsDeoxyribodipyrimidine Photo-LyaseDeoxyribonuclease (Pyrimidine Dimer)DNA DamageDNA RepairHumansSkin AgingSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysViral ProteinsDeoxyribodipyrimidine Photo-LyaseDeoxyribonuclease (Pyrimidine Dimer)endonuclease V, phage T4Sunscreening AgentsViral ProteinsDNA repair enzymesendonucleasephotoageingphotolyasesunscreens

Identifiers

PMID32772409
PMCPMC7693079
OpenAlexW3047888395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.