Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772282›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2021

Blood lactate predicts survival after percutaneous implantation of extracorporeal life support for refractory cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome: insights from the CareGem registry.

Italo Porto, Alessio Mattesini, Domenico D'Amario, Carlotta Sorini Dini, Roberta Della Bona, Marco Scicchitano, Rocco Vergallo, Antonio Martellini, Simona Caporusso, Carlo Trani and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Italo PortoDipartimento CardioToracoVascolare, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network, Genoa, Italy.
Alessio MattesiniDipartimento del Cuore e dei Vasi, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Domenico D'AmarioDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Carlotta Sorini DiniSpedali Riuniti, Leghorn, Italy.
Roberta Della BonaDipartimento CardioToracoVascolare, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network, Genoa, Italy.
Marco ScicchitanoOspedale Sandro Pertini, Roma, Italy.
Rocco VergalloDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Antonio MartelliniDipartimento del Cuore e dei Vasi, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-769X
Simona CaporussoIRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Roma, Italy.
Carlo TraniDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BurzottaDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Piergiorgio BrunoDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Carlo Di MarioDipartimento del Cuore e dei Vasi, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Filippo CreaDipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Serafina Valente *U.O.C. Cardiologia Ospedaliera, A.O.U. Senese Ospedale Santa Maria Alle Scotte, Siena, Italy.
Massimo Massetti *Dipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 00168, Rome, Italy. massimo.massetti@unicatt.it.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITOspedale Sandro Pertini · ITOspedale Santa Maria alle Scotte · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS) or refractory cardiac arrest (RCA) complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with extremely high mortality rate. Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) represents a valuable therapeutic option to stabilize patients' condition before or at the time of emergency revascularization. We analyzed 29 consecutive patients with RCS or RCA complicating ACS, and implanted with VA-ECLS in two centers who have adopted a similar, structured approach to ECLS implantation. Data were collected from January 2010 to December 2015 and ECLS had to be percutaneously implanted either before (within 48 h) or at the time of attempted percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI). We investigated in-hospital outcome and factors associated with survival. Twenty-one (72%) were implanted for RCA, whereas 8 (28%) were implanted on ECLS for RCS. All RCA were witnessed and no-flow time was shorter than 5 min in all cases but one. All patients underwent attempted emergency PCI, using radial access in ten cases (34.5%), whereas in three patients a subsequent CABG was performed. Overall, ten patients (34.5%) survived, nine of them with a good neurological outcome. Life threatening complications, including stroke (4 pts), leg ischemia (4 pts), intestinal ischemia (5 pts), and deep vein thrombosis 2 pts), occurred frequently, but were not associated with in-hospital death. Main cause of death was multi-organ failure. PCI variables did not predict survival. Survivors were younger, with shorter low-flow time, and with ECLS mainly implanted for RCS. At multivariate analysis, levels of lactate at ECLS implantation (OR 4.32, 95%CI 1.01-18.51, p = 0.049) emerged as the only variable that independently predicted survival. In patients with RCA or RCS complicating ACS who are percutaneously implanted with ECLS before or at the time of coronary revascularization, in hospital survival rate is higher than 30%. Level of lactate at ECLS implantation appears to be the most important factor to predict survival.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAcute Coronary SyndromeBiomarkersFemaleHeart ArrestHospital MortalityHumansItalyLactatesMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesRisk FactorsShock, CardiogenicBiomarkersLactatesAcute coronary syndromeCardiac arrestCardiogenic shockExtracorporeal life support

Identifiers

PMID32772282
PMCPMC7952335
OpenAlexW3048274324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.