Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772277›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Trends of complications and innovative techniques' utilization for colectomies in the United States.

Mohamed A Abd El Aziz, Fabian Grass, Kevin T Behm, Sherief Shawki, Anne-Lise D'Angelo, Kellie L Mathis, David W Larson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed A Abd El AzizDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 first St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Fabian GrassDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 first St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kevin T BehmDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 first St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Sherief ShawkiDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 first St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Anne-Lise D'AngeloDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 first St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kellie L MathisDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 first St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
David W LarsonDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 first St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Larson.David2@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite an increasing trend towards utilization of minimally invasive approaches (MIS), results regarding their safety profile are contradictory. All patients who underwent elective colectomy for any underlying disease with an identifiable operative approach available from the targeted colectomy files of the ACS-NSQIP PUFs 2013 to 2018 were included. The trend of utilization and complication rates of the different operative approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic) were assessed during the inclusion period. Furthermore, overall, surgical, and medical complications were compared between the three approaches. The study cohort included 78,987 patients. Of them, 12,335 (15.6%) patients underwent open, 57,874 (73.3%) laparoscopic, and 8,778 (11.1%) robotic surgery. There was an increasing trend towards the utilization of robotic surgery (2.5% increase per year) at the expense of the other approaches. With the increasing trend toward the utilization of the robotic approach, a decreasing trend in overall and surgical complications and length of stay was observed. After adjusting for the baseline confounders, robotic surgery was associated with shorter length of stay, lower rate of overall (OR 0.397; p < 0.05 compared to open and OR: 0.763; p < 0.05 compared to laparoscopy) and surgical complications (OR: 0.464; p < 0.05 compared to open and OR: 0.734; p < 0.05 compared to laparoscopy). This study revealed an increasing trend toward the utilization of MIS for elective colectomy in the US. Robotic surgery was associated with a decreasing trend in overall and surgical morbidity and length of stay.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overColectomyElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMalePostoperative ComplicationsProcedures and Techniques UtilizationRobotic Surgical ProceduresSafetyUnited StatesColectomyLaparoscopicOpenRoboticSurgical complicationsTrend analysis

Identifiers

PMID32772277
OpenAlexW3048109787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.