Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772276›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Obturator hernias: a systematic review of the literature.

D Schizas, K Apostolou, N Hasemaki, P Kanavidis, D Tsapralis, N Garmpis, C Damaskos, A Alexandrou, D Filippou, K Kontzoglou

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Management and outcomes of obturator hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D SchizasFirst Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Ag. Thoma 17 Str., Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece.
K ApostolouFirst Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Ag. Thoma 17 Str., Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece. konstantinos.apostolou@gmail.com.
N HasemakiFirst Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Ag. Thoma 17 Str., Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece.
P KanavidisFirst Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Ag. Thoma 17 Str., Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece.
D TsapralisSurgical Department, General Hospital of Ierapetra, Ierapetra, Greece.
N GarmpisSecond Propedeutic Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
C DamaskosSecond Propedeutic Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
A AlexandrouFirst Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Ag. Thoma 17 Str., Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece.
D FilippouDepartment of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
K KontzoglouSecond Propedeutic Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeObturator hernias (OH) are extremely rare hernias, accounting for 0.07-1% of all hernias. This is the first systematic review investigating their presentation, imaging, treatment outcomes, and recurrence rate.

methodsAfter a detailed search in electronic search engines, 74 studies matched our criteria. A review of these reports was conducted and the full texts were examined.

resultsA total of 146 patients with a mean age of 78.8 years were included in our analysis, with 40.1%, 29.9%, and 25.2% of patients suffering from either a right, a left or bilateral OH, respectively. OH were associated with non-specific symptoms and signs; bowel obstruction being the most common. Howship-Romberg sign was present in 56.2% of patients. Computed tomography (CT) scan was the most frequently used diagnostic modality, inversely associated with perioperative mortality. Mesh repair demonstrated a significantly improved perioperative morbidity rate, compared with non-mesh repair. Approximately 30% of patients underwent a laparoscopic operation, which was associated with significantly decreased morbidity and mortality rate as well as length of hospital stay, compared with the open repair.

conclusionOHs are not associated with specific symptoms and signs; thus, they constitute a diagnostic challenge, requiring a high level of clinical suspicion. Undoubtedly, CT scan of the abdomen is the gold standard diagnostic tool. Their operative repair is mandatory, with the laparoscopic approach demonstrating significant advantages over the open repair.

Indexed as

Hernia, ObturatorHerniorrhaphyHumansHerniaHowship–RombergLaparoscopicMeshObstructionObturator

Identifiers

PMID32772276
OpenAlexW3047958406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.