Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772269›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Timing day-3 vitrification for PGT-M embryos: pre- or post-blastomere biopsy?

Adva Aizer, Chen Shimon, Olga Dratviman-Storobinsky, Hagit Shani, Noa Harel Inbar, Ettie Maman, Raoul Orvieto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adva AizerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Infertility and IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. Adva.aizer@sheba.health.gov.il.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0820-8079
Chen ShimonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Infertility and IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Olga Dratviman-StorobinskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Infertility and IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Hagit ShaniSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Noa Harel InbarDanek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ettie MamanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Infertility and IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Raoul OrvietoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Infertility and IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the efficacy and clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M), following blastomere biopsy prior or following vitrification.

methodsA cohort-historical study of all consecutive patients admitted to IVF in a large tertiary center for PGT-M and PCR cycle from September 2016 to March 2020. Patients were divided into 4 groups: Group A1 consisted of patients undergoing day-3 embryos biopsy followed by a fresh transfer of unaffected embryos. Group A2 consisted of Group A1 patients that their surplus unaffected embryos were vitrified, thawed, and transferred in a subsequent FET cycle. Group B1 consisted of patients that their day-3 embryos were vitrified intact (without biopsy) for a subsequent FET cycle. Later embryos were thawed and underwent blastomere biopsies, and the unaffected embryos were transferred, while the surplus unaffected embryos were re-vitrified for a subsequent FET cycle. Group B2 consisted of Group B1 patients that their surplus unaffected embryos were re-vitrified, thawed, and transferred in a subsequent FET cycle. The laboratory data and clinical results were collected and compared between groups.

resultsA total of 368 patients underwent 529 PGT-M cycles in our center: 347 with day-3 embryos biopsied before undergoing vitrification (Group A1) and 182 following vitrification and thawing (Group B1). There were no between group differences in embryo survival rate post-thawing, nor the ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates.

conclusionIn PGT-M cycles, the timing of embryos vitrification, whether prior or following blastomere biopsy, has no detrimental effect on post-thawing embryo survival rate, nor their potential ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdultBiopsyBlastocystBlastomeresCryopreservationEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansPregnancyPreimplantation DiagnosisVitrificationBlastomere biopsyDay-3 biopsyPGT-MPregnancy ratePreimplantation genetic testingVitrification

Identifiers

PMID32772269
PMCPMC7550449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.