ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020
Estimation of sodium adsorption ratio in a river with kernel-based and decision-tree models.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrated groundwater vulnerability and artificial recharge site suitability assessment using GIS multi-criteria decision making approach in Kayseri region, Turkey.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Treatment of waste stabilization pond effluent using natural zeolite for irrigation potential.PloS one · 2022Article
- Decision tree for estimating groundwater contaminant through proxies considering seasonality and soil saturation.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- Prediction of water quality parameters using machine learning models: a case study of the Karun River, Iran.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The control of surface water quality plays an important role in the management of water resources. In this context, the estimation and assessment of sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) are required which is one of the significant water quality parameters in the agricultural production sector. Chemical analysis might not, however, be feasible for a longer period of time in all the country-scale rivers. Therefore in this study, a support vector regression (SVR) model with different kernel functions; K nearest neighbour algorithm; and four decision-tree models, namely, Hoeffding tree, random forest, random tree, and REPTree, were used to estimate the SAR value with minimal parameters in the Aladag River in Turkey. In alternative scenarios, a correlation matrix and sensitivity analysis were used to ascertain the model inputs from among the 15 distinct parameters. All 15 parameters were utilized as model inputs in the first scenario, and only the sodium (Na) parameter was utilized as the model input in the final scenario. The accuracy of the aforesaid models was then assessed making use of correlation coefficient, Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient, root mean square error, mean absolute error, and Willmott index of agreement. The results indicate that the SVR model with the poly kernel function provides the best estimates of SAR among the considered models. According to the findings, there is no considerable difference between the results acquired in the first and last scenarios, and one can determine the SAR value while making use of machine learning approaches taking into account only Na parameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32772253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.