ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021
Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case - "Burned-out" testicular tumor: A rare entity with diagnostic dilemma.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- Visible haematuria-an unusual presentation of metastatic testicular mixed germ cell tumour.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTreatment of metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC) is based on the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification published in 1997. 5-year survival rates were reported to be 91%, 79%, and 48% for patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis, respectively. However, treatment results may have improved over time due to cumulative experience, improved supportive care and modern-type chemotherapy.
methodsPatients with metastatic GCC who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy at two institutions in Munich between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed with respect to the IGCCG prognostic classification.
resultsOf 225 patients (median age 35 years), 72 (32%) had seminoma (S) and 153 (68%) nonseminoma. 175 (78%), 30 (13%) and 20 patients (9%) had good, intermediate and poor prognosis according to the IGCCCG classification. The 2-year-progression free survival of patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis was 91%, 83% and 37%, and the 5-year-overall survival (OS) was 98%, 96%, and 66%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS between patients in the good and intermediate prognosis group.
conclusionCompared to data from the original IGCCCG classification system, the outcome of patients with metastatic GCC has considerably improved over time. While the prognosis of intermediate-risk patients is excellent, treatment in the poor-prognosis group remains to be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.