ReviewInternational ophthalmology2020
Alternative mydriasis techniques for retinopathy of prematurity screening.
Review in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Mydriatic Microdrops Compared With Standard Drops for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) Screening: a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Efficacy and Safety of Mydriatic Microdrops for Retinopathy Of Prematurity Screening: a Non-inferiority Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial (MyMiROPS Trial)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Mydriatic Microdrops for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening: The MyMiROPS Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of mydriatic microdrops for retinopathy of prematurity screening: an external pilot crossover randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Trial
- Optimizing instilled drug delivery: a scoping review of microdrops in ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is a large variation in mydriatic regimens used in screening for retinopathy in preterm infants. Except for the standard instillation of mydriatic drops in their commercial formulation, other techniques for pupil dilation have also been described. This study aimed to review all techniques that have been used for mydriasis in retinopathy of prematurity eye examination (ROPEE) screening.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library, Trip database, and Scopus, using the key words: "mydriasis", "techniques", "mydriatics", "dilating drops", "retinopathy of prematurity", "ROP", "phenylephrine", "cyclopentolate", "tropicamide", "smaller mydriatic drops", "reduction in drop size" to February 2019.
resultsFive primary studies were included, assessing the techniques of microdrops, lower conjunctival fornix (LCF) packing and Mydriasert® ophthalmic insert. Reported efficacy was similar to commercial eyedrops instillation. Microdrops appeared to have a superior safety profile. LCF packing and Mydriasert lead to increased blood pressure, without serious complications, necessitating further safety studies.
conclusionsOf all alternative mydriasis techniques for ROPEE screening that have been described, microdrops appear to be the safest yet still effective technique in the fragile population of premature infants in risk of ROP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.