Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772160›Full record

Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

Thinner retinal nerve fibre layer in healthy myopic eyes with thinner central corneal thickness.

Esther Arranz-Marquez, Gorka Lauzirika, Miguel A Teus, Andreas Katsanos

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Esther Arranz-MarquezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain. e.arranzmarquez@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8805-5326
Gorka LauzirikaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-1521
Miguel A TeusNovovisión Clinic, Paseo de la Castellana, 54, 28046, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3835-9882
Andreas KatsanosOphthalmology Department, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6623-8503
Clínica Rementería · ESHospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThinner central corneal thickness (CCT) is a risk factor for conversion from ocular hypertension to glaucoma and for disease progression. However, little is known about the relationship between CCT and characteristics of the optic nerve and the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) in non-glaucomatous eyes. Because myopic eyes may pose diagnostic challenges when assessed for glaucoma, characterising the relationship between CCT and RNFL in these eyes is clinically relevant. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between CCT and RNFL thickness in non-glaucomatous eyes with small/moderate myopia.

methodsThis was a single-centre, observational, prospective, assessor-masked study. Consecutive eligible patients (myopia ≤ - 6.0 dioptres, astigmatism ≤ 2.0 dioptres) without other ocular or neurodegenerative diseases were included. Based on their CCT, the participants were allocated to group 1 (CCT > 555 μm) or group 2 (CCT < 555 μm). Peripapillary RNFL measurements were performed by a masked observer using the Spectralis OCT platform.

resultsSixty eyes were included in group 1 and 63 in group 2. The CCT in the two groups was significantly different (584.27 ± 22.8 μm vs 522.23 ± 20.03 μm, p = 0.0001). There were no other significant differences in the groups in terms of age, refraction, or intraocular pressure. The peripapillary RNFL thickness was higher (all p < 0.005) in group 1 at several sectors: superior-temporal, inferior-temporal, inferior-nasal, and average. A significant positive correlation between CCT and average RNFL thickness was found for the whole population (r = 0.31, p = 0.0001).

conclusionOtherwise, healthy myopes with thinner CCT have thinner RNFL compared with participants of similar age and refraction with thicker CCT.

Indexed as

MyopiaNerve FibersHumansProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical CoherenceCentral corneal thicknessGlaucomaMyopiaOptical coherence tomographyRetinal nerve fibre layer

Identifiers

PMID32772160
OpenAlexW3048280180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.