Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772136›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2021

Anterior knee pain and functional outcome following different surgical techniques for tibial nailing: a systematic review.

Mandala S Leliveld, Michael H J Verhofstad, Eduard Van Bodegraven, Jules Van Haaren, Esther M M Van Lieshout

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for the treatment of proximal tibia extra-articular fractures: a meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Incidence and Risk Factors of Heterotopic Ossification in the Knee After Reamed Tibial Nailing.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing: Future or Fad?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Extreme nailing and immediate weight bearing constructs in fractures of the distal tibia.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mandala S LeliveldTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael H J VerhofstadTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eduard Van BodegravenTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jules Van HaarenTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther M M Van LieshoutTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.vanlieshout@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-7948
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this systematic review was to compare knee pain and function after tibial nail insertion through an infrapatellar, semi-extended and suprapatellar technique.

methodsA search was carried out to identify articles with an exact description of the method used for insertion of the tibial nail and description of the outcome parameters (knee pain or function). Data on study design, population, rate and severity of anterior knee pain and function scores were extracted. Pooled rates and scores were calculated.

results67 studies with 3,499 patients were included. The pooled rate of patients with anterior knee pain was 38% (95% CI 32-44) after nail insertion through an infrapatellar approach and 10% (95% CI 1-26) after insertion through a suprapatellar approach. Pooled analysis was not possible for the semi-extended technique. Knee pain scores as measured by visual analogue score (0-10) ranged from 0.2 (95% CI - 0.1-0.5) for general knee pain to 3.7 (95% CI 1.3-6.1) for pain during kneeling. Pooled estimates for the Lysholm score were 87 points (range 77-97) for the infrapatellar technique and 85 points (range 82-85) for the suprapatellar technique. Iowa Knee scores were 94 (range 86-96) and Anterior Knee Pain Scale scores were 76 (range 75-80) after infrapatellar nail insertion. DISCUSSION: Depending on the technique used, the proportion of patients with knee pain after tibial nailing varied between 10 and 38%. The actual measured knee pain scores were, however, surprisingly low. Knee function was good for both the infra- and suprapatellar technique.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryPainTibial FracturesBone NailsHumansTibiaTreatment OutcomeInfrapatellar tibial nailingOutcomeSuprapatellar tibial nailing

Identifiers

PMID32772136
PMCPMC8187175
OpenAlexW3048335144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.