Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772117›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2021

Unraveling the camel rumen microbiome through metaculturomics approach for agriculture waste hydrolytic potential.

Shweta Srivastava, Nishant A Dafale, Subhash J Jakhesara, Chaitanya G Joshi, Niteen V Patil, Hemant J Purohit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Screening the Rumen of Balochi Camel (Indian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Foregut microbiology of the Arabian camel (Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shweta SrivastavaEnvironmental Biotechnology and Genomics Division, CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, 440020, India.
Nishant A DafaleEnvironmental Biotechnology and Genomics Division, CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, 440020, India. na_dafale@neeri.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-0070
Subhash J JakhesaraDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, 388001, India.
Chaitanya G JoshiDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, 388001, India.
Niteen V PatilNational Research Centre On Camel, Indian Council for Agriculture Research, Bikaner, 334001, India.
Hemant J PurohitEnvironmental Biotechnology and Genomics Division, CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, 440020, India.
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute · INAnand Agricultural University · INNational Research Centre on Camel · IN

Funding

Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology BT/PR15586/AAQ/1/651/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose is the most abundant natural polymer present on Earth in the form of agriculture waste. Hydrolysis of agriculture waste for simple fermentable reducing sugars is the bottleneck in the area of biofuel generation and other value-added products. The present study aims to utilize the camel rumen as a bioreactor for potent cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic bacteria by altering the feed types with varying cellulosic concentrations. A total of 6716 bacterial cultures were subjected to three layers of screening, where plate zymography and chromophoric substrate screening served as primary screening method for cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic potential. The potential isolates were genetically grouped using RAPD, and 51 representative isolates from each group were subjected to molecular identification through 16S rDNA sequencing, followed by quantification of various cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes. Out of 51 potent isolates, 5 isolates had high endoglucanase activity ranging from 0.3 to 0.48 U/ml. The selected five key isolates identified as Pseudomonas, Paenibacillus, Citrobacter, Bacillus subtilis, and Enterobacter were employed for hydrolyzing the various agriculture residues and resulted in approximately 0.4 mg/ml of reducing sugar. Furthermore, the metaculturomics approach was implemented to deduce the total cultured diversity through 16S rRNA amplicon library sequencing. The metaculturomics data revealed the dominance of proteobacteria and unidentified bacterial population in all four feed types, which indicates the possibility of culturing novel cellulose-deconstructing bacteria. Moreover, the presence of diverse hydrolytic enzymes in cultured isolates supports the usage of these bacteria in bio-processing of agriculture waste residues and obtaining the biofuels and other value-added products.

Indexed as

AgricultureBacteriaBiofuelsMicrobiotaAnimalsCamelusCellulaseCelluloseHydrolysisRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenBiofuelsCellulaseCelluloseRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAgriculture waste hydrolysisCamel microbiomeEnzyme activityMetaculturomicsMicrobial diversity

Identifiers

PMID32772117
OpenAlexW3048069913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.