Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32772114›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2021

A Review of Multimodal Hallucinations: Categorization, Assessment, Theoretical Perspectives, and Clinical Recommendations.

Marcella Montagnese, Pantelis Leptourgos, Charles Fernyhough, Flavie Waters, Frank Larøi, Renaud Jardri, Simon McCarthy-Jones, Neil Thomas, Rob Dudley, John-Paul Taylor and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. On the 'Hallucinations' of Artificial Intelligence and the Hallucination Experience in Human.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Marcella MontagneseNeuroimaging Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
Pantelis LeptourgosDepartment of Psychiatry, Connecticut Mental Health Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Charles FernyhoughDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Flavie WatersSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Frank LarøiDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Renaud JardriUniversity of Lille, INSERM U1172, CHU Lille, Centre Lille Neuroscience and Cognition, Lille, France.
Simon McCarthy-JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Neil ThomasCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Rob DudleyGateshead Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
John-Paul TaylorTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Daniel CollertonSchool of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Prabitha UrwylerTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBCumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust · GBDurham University · GBInserm · FRKing's College London · GBThe Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Liège · BEYale University · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT108720Wellcome Trust WT209513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hallucinations can occur in different sensory modalities, both simultaneously and serially in time. They have typically been studied in clinical populations as phenomena occurring in a single sensory modality. Hallucinatory experiences occurring in multiple sensory systems-multimodal hallucinations (MMHs)-are more prevalent than previously thought and may have greater adverse impact than unimodal ones, but they remain relatively underresearched. Here, we review and discuss: (1) the definition and categorization of both serial and simultaneous MMHs, (2) available assessment tools and how they can be improved, and (3) the explanatory power that current hallucination theories have for MMHs. Overall, we suggest that current models need to be updated or developed to account for MMHs and to inform research into the underlying processes of such hallucinatory phenomena. We make recommendations for future research and for clinical practice, including the need for service user involvement and for better assessment tools that can reliably measure MMHs and distinguish them from other related phenomena.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderHallucinationsPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaHumanscomputationalhallucinationsmultisensorypsychosis

Identifiers

PMID32772114
PMCPMC7825001
OpenAlexW3047631920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.