ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
Laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer in an automated peritoneal dialysis patient: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is little evidence to support the safety of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in restarting immediately after abdominal surgery. It is also unclear whether early recovery of PD in minimally invasive abdominal surgery reduces the risk of complications. This is the first case report of laparoscopic proctectomy in a patient on PD. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 66-year-old female patient with end-stage renal disease underwent daily automated peritoneal dialysis. Colonoscopy in the patient suggested rectal cancer. After laparoscopic rectum resection, restart PD on post-operative day 2. Two weeks after the operation, the patient's surgical wound healed well and renal function recovered to the same as before, and the original PD plan was maintained without obvious discomfort. DISCUSSION: Multiple other case reports have shown that PD has been safely resumed after various operations. However, PD patients undergoing abdominal surgery may cause serious complications. Maybe the peritoneal dialysis restores immediately after surgery should consider some conditions.
conclusionWe think that it may be safe for PD patients to continue to maintain PD after laparoscopic rectum resection without the need for temporary hemodialysis transition. More cases will be collected in the future to consolidate this conclusion and provide reference for the diagnosis and treatment of similar cases in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.