Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32771888›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology2020

Being an obstetrics and gynaecology resident during the COVID-19: Impact of the pandemic on the residency training program.

Giovanna Bitonti, Anna Rita Palumbo, Cinzia Gallo, Erika Rania, Gabriele Saccone, Valentino De Vivo, Fulvio Zullo, Costantino Di Carlo, Roberta Venturella

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence and factors associated with anxiety, depression and burnout in gynecology and obstetrics residents during the COVID-19 pandemic.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A Study of the Current Scenario of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Iranian Psychiatric Trainees' and Early Career Psychiatrists' Well-being, Work Conditions, and Education.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giovanna BitontiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Anna Rita PalumboDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. Electronic address: a.palumbo34@gmail.com.
Cinzia GalloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Erika RaniaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Gabriele SacconeDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Valentino De VivoDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fulvio ZulloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Costantino Di CarloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Roberta VenturellaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the obstetrics and gynecology residency training program in Italy. STUDY

designThis was a cross-sectional survey study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the obstetrics and gynecology residency training program in Italy. An online survey with 45 questions was sent and completed anonymously by residents after accepting an informed consent. The invitation to the online survey was sent to all the Italian residents in obstetrics and gynecology. Those on maternity leave at the time of the study were excluded. Residents were asked about their routinely activity before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to report the reduction in their clinical practice. They were also asked about psychological impact of COVID-19 on their clinical practice.

results933 Italian residents in obstetrics and gynecology, were invited for this survey study. Four-hundred and seventy-six (51 %) completed the survey and were included in the study. Three-hundred and eighty-seven (81.3 %) were female, and 89 (18.7 %) were male. Residents age ranged from 25 to 42. In 71,8 % (342/476) of the cases residents work in a COVID-19 reference Hospitals. One-hundred and eighty-four out of 76 residents (38.6 %) were tested on RT-PCR assay of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens, and of them 12/184 (6.5 %) were positive to SARS-COV-2. Regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), 267 (56.1 %) reported to receive adequate device, and 379 (79.6 %) felt to be well informed about prevention and management protocols. Three-hundred and thirty-one residents (69.5 %) reported to have managed COVID-19 positive patients. For 54,7 % of respondent residents, training activity in general decreased significantly during the COVID-19 epidemic. A one-third reduction was reported in 31,4 % of the cases, whereas a total suspension of the training in 9,9 % of the cases. In 89,3 % of cases the reduction was caused by the reorganization of work. Anxiety about the professional future was reported in 84 % of the residents, and 59 % of them had the perception that their training was irreversibly compromised.

conclusionsAmong Italian residents in obstetrics and gynecology, COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant training impairment.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAdultBetacoronavirusClinical CompetenceCOVID-19FemaleGynecologyHumansInternship and ResidencyItalyMaleObstetricsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousCoronavirusEuropeanGynecologyImpactObstetricsTraining

Identifiers

PMID32771888
PMCPMC7395645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.