Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32771654›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2020

Association Between Time to Operation and Pathologic Stage in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Christina A Minami, Olga Kantor, Anna Weiss, Faina Nakhlis, Tari A King, Elizabeth A Mittendorf

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on new starts to oral oncology medications in the US.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2023
    Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Surgery Fellowships.Current breast cancer reports · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christina A MinamiDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Olga KantorDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Anna WeissDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Faina NakhlisDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Tari A KingDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Elizabeth A MittendorfDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address: emittendorf@bwh.harvard.edu.
American College of Surgeons · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical delays have been common for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early-stage estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, often in favor of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). To understand possible ramifications of these delays, we examined the association between time to operation and pathologic staging and overall survival (OS). STUDY

designPatients with DCIS or ER+ cT1-2N0 breast cancer treated from 2010 through 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Time to operation was recorded. Factors associated with pathologic upstaging were examined using logistic regression analyses. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze OS. Analyses were stratified by disease stage and initial treatment strategy.

resultsThere were 378,839 patients identified. Among those undergoing primary surgical procedure, time to operation was within 120 days in > 98% in all groups. Among cT1-2N0 patients selected for NET, operations were performed within 120 days in 59.6% of cT1N0 and 30.9% of cT2N0 patients. Increased time to operation was associated with increased odds of pathologic upstaging in DCIS patients (ER+: 60 to 120 days: odds ratio 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.22; more than 120 days: odds ratio 1.44; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.68; ER-: 60 to 120 days: NS; more than 120 days: odds ratio 1.36; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.82; 60 days or less: reference), but not in patients with invasive cancer, irrespective of initial treatment strategy. No difference in OS was seen by time to operation in DCIS or NET patients.

conclusionsIncreased time to operation was associated with a small increase in pathologic upstaging in DCIS patients, but did not impact OS. In patients with cT1-2N0 disease, NET use did not impact stage or OS, supporting the safety of delay strategies in ER+ breast cancer patients during the pandemic.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusNeoplasm StagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastComorbidityCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID32771654
PMCPMC7409804
OpenAlexW3047268691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.