Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32771596›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2020

T regulatory cells and TGF-β1: Predictors of the host response in mesh complications.

Amanda M Artsen, Rui Liang, Leslie Meyn, Matthew Rytel, Stacy Palcsey, Steven D Abramowitch, Pamela A Moalli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda M ArtsenMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Lab A320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Rui LiangMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Lab A320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Leslie MeynMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Lab A320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Matthew RytelMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Lab A320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Stacy PalcseyMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Lab A320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Steven D AbramowitchDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Pamela A MoalliMagee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Lab A320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: moalpa@upmc.edu.
Magee-Womens Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · US

Funding

Porosity and tensioning: Critical factors to consider when choosing a prolapse meshR01HD083383 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ABRAMOWITCH, STEVEN D, MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2016 to 2025
$5.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypropylene mesh is frequently used in urogynecology procedures; however, pain and mesh exposure into the vagina occur in ~10% of cases. Mesh-induced pain, which occurs with or without exposure, persists after removal in 50% of cases. Chronic pain history predicts poor response to mesh removal but only a fraction have this diagnosis. We hypothesize that mesh induced pain is correlated with fibrosis and failure to improve with a heightened inflammatory and fibrotic host response. Women undergoing mesh removal were offered participation in a mesh biorepository. Standardized questionnaires including visual analog scale (VAS) pelvic pain scores were completed at enrollment and 6 months after removal. Responders were considered those with ≥13 mm VAS improvement. 30 mesh-tissue explants were randomly selected for analysis. Samples were labeled for CD8, CD4 (T

Indexed as

Surgical MeshTransforming Growth Factor beta1CollagenFemaleHumansPolypropylenesVaginaCollagenPolypropylenesTransforming Growth Factor beta1FibrosisPolypropylene meshProlapseTGF-β1T regulatory cells

Identifiers

PMID32771596
PMCPMC8735672
OpenAlexW3047863907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.