Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32771064›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2020

Potential methanol toxicity and the importance of using a standardised alcohol-based hand rub formulation in the era of COVID-19.

K Dear, L Grayson, R Nixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Methanol poisoning during COVID-19 pandemic; A systematic scoping review.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. [Disinfectants during the COVID-19 pandemic: a challenge].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K DearOccupational Dermatology Research and Education Centre, Skin Health Institute, Level 1/80 Drummond Street, Melbourne, Australia.
L GraysonUniversity of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
R NixonOccupational Dermatology Research and Education Centre, Skin Health Institute, Level 1/80 Drummond Street, Melbourne, Australia. rnixon@occderm.asn.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2554-6918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHand sanitisers are urgently needed in the time of COVID-19, and as a result of shortages, some people have resorted to making their own formulations, including the repurposing of distilleries. We wish to highlight the importance of those producing hand sanitisers to avoid methylated spirits containing methanol and to follow WHO recommended formulations.

methodsWe explore and discuss reports of methanol toxicity through ingestion and transdermal absorption. We discuss the WHO formulations and explain the rationale behind the chosen ingredients. SHORT

conclusionWe advise those producing hand sanitisers to follow WHO recommended formulations, and advise those producing hand sanitisers using methylated spirits, to avoid formulations which contain methanol.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19DisinfectantsDrug CompoundingEthanolHand DisinfectionHumansMethanolPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2World Health OrganizationDisinfectantsEthanolMethanolAlcohol-based-hand-rubsMethanol toxicitySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32771064
PMCPMC7414286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.