Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32771059›Full record

SynthesisAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2020

High rate of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative infections and associated mortality in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tafese B Tufa, Andre Fuchs, Takele B Tufa, Loraine Stötter, Achim J Kaasch, Torsten Feldt, Dieter Häussinger, Colin R Mackenzie

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antibiotic resistance and ESBL production inBulletin of the National Research Centre · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Tafese B TufaHirsch Institute of Tropical Medicine, P.O. Box 04, Asella, Ethiopia. tafeseb.tufa@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9505-9341
Andre FuchsCollege of Health Sciences, Arsi University, P.O. Box 04, Asella, Ethiopia.
Takele B TufaCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Loraine StötterHirsch Institute of Tropical Medicine, P.O. Box 04, Asella, Ethiopia.
Achim J KaaschInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Düsseldorf University Hospital Centre, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Torsten FeldtHirsch Institute of Tropical Medicine, P.O. Box 04, Asella, Ethiopia.
Dieter HäussingerHirsch Institute of Tropical Medicine, P.O. Box 04, Asella, Ethiopia.
Colin R MackenzieInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Düsseldorf University Hospital Centre, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria have become a serious threat to global health. Their rapid spread is associated with high mortality due to ineffective antibiotic treatment. To date a regular surveillance of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in Ethiopia is not established. For this report, published data regarding ESBL-producing bacteria in different health facilities of Ethiopia were reviewed.

methodsThis study collates data from published information on the rates and clinical implications of infection with ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria in Ethiopia. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, PubMed Central, Medline, Science Direct and Google scholar from October 2018 to March 2019. Eligible studies were identified by applying quality criteria. The pooled proportion of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria was estimated based on a random effect model. The publication bias and the variation in proportion estimates attributed to heterogeneity were assessed.

resultsFourteen studies with relevant data were included in the review. In total, 1649 Gram-negative bacteria isolated from 5191 clinical samples were included. The pooled proportion estimate of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria was 50% (95% CI: 47.7-52.5%. Data showed a high level of heterogeneity (I

conclusionsIn this meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of ESBL-producing pathogens is alarmingly high. Data on mortality rates is scarce. This highlights the need for establishing and upgrading clinical microbiology laboratories in Ethiopia for routine antibiotic susceptibility testing and extended surveillance of multidrug resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEthiopiaGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesAntimicrobial resistanceESBLGram-negative bacteriaMultidrug-resistance

Identifiers

PMID32771059
PMCPMC7414654
OpenAlexW3047903617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.