Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32771009›Full record

SynthesisBMC endocrine disorders2020

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of the type 1 diabetes: a meta-regression and updated meta-analysis.

Na Zhai, Ramtin Bidares, Masoud Hassanzadeh Makoui, Saeed Aslani, Payam Mohammadi, Bahman Razi, Danyal Imani, Mohammad Yazdchi, Haleh Mikaeili

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC endocrine disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. A critical review on therapeutic approaches of CRISPR-Cas9 in diabetes mellitus.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Variants in theNutrients · 2022
    Article
  16. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Na ZhaiEndocrine 1st Department, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding, 071000, China. zhai13331222287@126.com.
Ramtin BidaresDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Masoud Hassanzadeh MakouiDepartment of Immunology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed AslaniDepartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Payam MohammadiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Bahman RaziDepartment of Hematology, School of Medicine, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Danyal ImaniDepartment of Immunology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad YazdchiNeuroscience Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Haleh MikaeiliTuberculosis and lung Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran. mikaeilihale@gmail.com.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRTarbiat Modares University · IRBaoding No.1 Central HospitalSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between the polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene and the risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been evaluated in several studies. However, the findings were inconclusive. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effect of VDR gene polymorphisms on the risk of T1DM.

methodsAll relevant studies reporting the association between VDR gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to T1DM published up to May 2020 were identified by comprehensive systematic database search in ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed/MEDLINE. Strength of association were assessed by calculating of pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The methodological quality of each study was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. To find the potential sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analysis were also performed.

resultsA total of 39 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results of overall population rejected any significant association between VDR gene polymorphisms and T1DM risk. However, the pooled results of subgroup analysis revealed significant negative and positive associations between FokI and BsmI polymorphisms and T1DM in Africans and Americans, respectively.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggested a significant association between VDR gene polymorphism and T1DM susceptibility in ethnic-specific analysis.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, CalcitriolVDR protein, humanMeta-analysisPolymorphismType 1 diabetes mellitusVitamin D receptor

Identifiers

PMID32771009
PMCPMC7414991
OpenAlexW3048137701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.